Article View: comp.arch
Article #102Re: What's wrong with stack machines?
From: Nick Janow
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 07:12
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 07:12
21 lines
1188 bytes
1188 bytes
Philip Koopman Jr. did a good job discussing stack machines in "Stack Computers, the New Wave." It's good reading. :) mchst12@cislabs.pitt.edu (Mark Hahn) writes: > Stack machines always have compact instructions, since for most > instructions, all three operands are implicit, which saves 15 bits per > instruction. It's conceivable that such a machine would pack 4 > instructions into a word, even with riscy instruction formats. The rest of > the machine would be 32bits wide, of course. Chuck Moore's MuP-20 packs four instructions per word; a 20 bit word. There are only 32 instructions. At an expected 7-40 MIPS, with certain loops of 200 MIPS, it has potential to be a hot chip for embedded applications. :) I'm not sure what the current status of the chip is. -- Nick_Janow@mindlink.bc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16986@mindlink.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a684Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a684 From: Nick_Janow@mindlink.bc.ca (Nick Janow) Subject: Re: What's wrong with stack machines? Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 07:12:16 GMT Message-ID: <16986@mindlink.bc.ca> Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet) Lines: 21