🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #102

Re: What's wrong with stack machines?

#102
From: Nick Janow
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 07:12
21 lines
1188 bytes
Philip Koopman Jr. did a good job discussing stack machines in "Stack
Computers, the New Wave."  It's good reading.  :)


mchst12@cislabs.pitt.edu (Mark Hahn) writes:

> Stack machines always have compact instructions, since for most
> instructions, all three operands are implicit, which saves 15 bits per
> instruction.  It's conceivable that such a machine would pack 4
> instructions into a word, even with riscy instruction formats. The rest of
> the machine would be 32bits wide, of course.

Chuck Moore's MuP-20 packs four instructions per word; a 20 bit word.  There
are only 32 instructions.  At an expected 7-40 MIPS, with certain loops of
200 MIPS, it has potential to be a hot chip for embedded applications.  :)

I'm not sure what the current status of the chip is.

--

Nick_Janow@mindlink.bc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID: <16986@mindlink.bc.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a684

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a684
From: Nick_Janow@mindlink.bc.ca (Nick Janow)
Subject: Re: What's wrong with stack machines?
Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 07:12:16 GMT
Message-ID: <16986@mindlink.bc.ca>
Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet)
Lines: 21