Article View: comp.arch
Article #10722Re: Clarification on 3 Addr vs 2 Addr Archs
From: Mark Smotherman
Date: Wed, 08 May 1991 19:45
Date: Wed, 08 May 1991 19:45
10 lines
988 bytes
988 bytes
Flynn's work with the Architect's Workbench is relevant, and
while I don't find this specific comparison mentioned in the
Sept. 1987 IEEE Computer article (Flynn, Mitchell and Mulder,
"And now a case for more complex instruction sets"), it would
seem easy to do with awb. You could compare FIX32 with your
own definition of a two-address instruction format. Main
problem would be in how to handle offsets and immediate values.
--
Mark Smotherman, CS Dept., Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906
mark@cs.clemson.edu or mark@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May8.194532.29242@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!markReferences:
<1991May7.195932.8770@rice.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!mark From: mark@hubcap.clemson.edu (Mark Smotherman) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Clarification on 3 Addr vs 2 Addr Archs Message-ID: <1991May8.194532.29242@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 8 May 91 19:45:32 GMT References: <1991May7.195932.8770@rice.edu> Organization: Clemson University Lines: 10