Article View: comp.arch
Article #11117Re: COMPAQ PROPOSED SCALABLE I/O ARCHITECTURE
From: AJ Casamento
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:55
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:55
61 lines
2757 bytes
2757 bytes
In article <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org> rminnich@super.org (Ronald G
Minnich) writes:
>>In article <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu
>>writes:
>> >You guys ever thought of licensing TurboChannel from DEC and building a
>> >Pentium box/server around it?
>> TurboChannel is a dog.
>> Actually, seems to me they could look at SCI. Except they want low cost.
>> But if the CMOS chips for SCI pan out, maybe they will meet the cost
>> range.
>> ron
Ron,
I'm confused. Is there something to back this opinion up? Which machine or
implementation are you discussing? For my own view of things TURBOchannel is
the fastest shipping desktop interconnect in the market (with internal designs
of network options that have sustained over 80MB/s under software control).
If there are specific examples of issues you've seen with performance I'd be
interested.
The platform breakdown looks something like this:
12.5MHz 50MB/s 25MHz 100MB/s
DS5000/20 DS5000/200
DS5000/25 DS5000/240
DS5000/33 DS5900
DS5000/120 DEC3000/400 (actually 93MB/s)
DS5000/125 DEC3000/500
DS5000/133
If you have questions about specific platform implementations (the numbers
quoted are theoretical peak bandwidth, the highest I've seen a 12.5MHz system
run is ~44MB/s and a 25MHz system is ~82MB/s). And the DS5000/200 started
shipping in April of 1990.
I hope that clears things up.
Thanx,
AJ
ps. I haven't included the VS4000/60 or VS4000/90 on this as the TURBOchannel
on those systems is a bridge adapter which is bounded in performance by the
bus on the system module.
**********************************************************************
* AJ Casamento "The question is not whether or *
* Digital's TRI/ADD Program not the opinions are mine; but *
* 529 Bryant Ave. PAG-2 rather, which of my personalities *
* Palo Alto, CA 94301-1616 do they belong to?" *
* 415.617.3460 *
* ajc@pa.dec.com *
**********************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<AJC.92Dec16175542@thendara.pa.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!ajcReferences:
<1992Dec15.171554.2781@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!ajc From: ajc@pa.dec.com (AJ Casamento) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: COMPAQ PROPOSED SCALABLE I/O ARCHITECTURE Date: 16 Dec 92 17:55:42 Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 61 Message-ID: <AJC.92Dec16175542@thendara.pa.dec.com> References: <1992Dec15.171554.2781@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: thendara.pa.dec.com In-reply-to: rminnich@super.org's message of Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:56:39 GMT