🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #11117

Re: COMPAQ PROPOSED SCALABLE I/O ARCHITECTURE

#11117
From: AJ Casamento
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:55
61 lines
2757 bytes

In article <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org> rminnich@super.org (Ronald G 
Minnich) writes:

>>In article <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> sysmgr@king.eng.umd.edu 
>>writes:
>> >You guys ever thought of licensing TurboChannel from DEC and building a
>> >Pentium box/server around it? 

>> TurboChannel is a dog. 

>> Actually, seems to me they could look at SCI. Except they want low cost.
>> But if the CMOS chips for SCI pan out, maybe they will meet the cost 
>> range.
>> ron

Ron,

  I'm confused. Is there something to back this opinion up? Which machine or
implementation are you discussing? For my own view of things TURBOchannel is
the fastest shipping desktop interconnect in the market (with internal designs
of network options that have sustained over 80MB/s under software control).

If there are specific examples of issues you've seen with performance I'd be
interested.

The platform breakdown looks something like this:

	12.5MHz  50MB/s				25MHz  100MB/s

	DS5000/20				DS5000/200
	DS5000/25				DS5000/240
	DS5000/33				DS5900
	DS5000/120				DEC3000/400 (actually 93MB/s)
	DS5000/125				DEC3000/500
	DS5000/133

If you have questions about specific platform implementations (the numbers
quoted are theoretical peak bandwidth, the highest I've seen a 12.5MHz system
run is ~44MB/s and a 25MHz system is ~82MB/s). And the DS5000/200 started 
shipping in April of 1990.

I hope that clears things up.

				Thanx,
				  AJ


ps. I haven't included the VS4000/60 or VS4000/90 on this as the TURBOchannel
    on those systems is a bridge adapter which is bounded in performance by the
    bus on the system module.

      **********************************************************************
      * AJ Casamento			"The question is not whether or    *
      * Digital's TRI/ADD Program	 not the opinions are mine; but    *
      * 529 Bryant Ave. PAG-2		 rather, which of my personalities *
      * Palo Alto, CA 94301-1616	 do they belong to?"		   *
      * 415.617.3460							   *
      * ajc@pa.dec.com  						   *
      **********************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <AJC.92Dec16175542@thendara.pa.dec.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!ajc
References: <1992Dec15.171554.2781@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com> <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!ajc
From: ajc@pa.dec.com (AJ Casamento)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: COMPAQ PROPOSED SCALABLE I/O ARCHITECTURE
Date: 16 Dec 92 17:55:42
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <AJC.92Dec16175542@thendara.pa.dec.com>
References: <1992Dec15.171554.2781@twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com>
 <1992Dec15.194637.10009@eng.umd.edu> <1992Dec15.205639.25591@super.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: thendara.pa.dec.com
In-reply-to: rminnich@super.org's message of Tue, 15 Dec 1992 20:56:39 GMT