Article View: comp.arch
Article #11351Re: reentrant
From: Michael Meissner
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 23:50
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 23:50
23 lines
1459 bytes
1459 bytes
In article <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu> john@iastate.edu (John Hascall) writes:
| Perhaps the research world has been...
| But as far as (popular) commercially available OSes, it would seem not:
|
| MS-DOS: not a chance
| VMS: nope
| MVS: sort of, but horrid
| VM: I dunno, and I hope never to find out ;-)
| OS/2: ditto
| UNIX: not yet
| OSF/1: yes, but not much of a commercial success at this point
Data General's propitary operating systems (R[TD]OS, AOS{,/VS,/VS-II}
have had threads (called tasks) since the 70's (early 70's I think).
Many of the multiprocessor UNIX versions have had threads in one form
or another, and certainly the MPP systems.
--
Michael Meissner email: meissner@osf.org phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142
You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MEISSNER.93Jan3185011@curley.osf.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!meissnerReferences:
<id.JY9W.Y64@ferranti.com> <C04zn2.A95.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1993Jan2.122544.26198@sei.cmu.edu> <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!meissner From: meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner) Subject: Re: reentrant In-Reply-To: john@iastate.edu's message of 2 Jan 93 19:06:39 GMT Message-ID: <MEISSNER.93Jan3185011@curley.osf.org> Lines: 23 Sender: news@osf.org (USENET News System) Organization: Open Software Foundation References: <id.JY9W.Y64@ferranti.com> <C04zn2.A95.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1993Jan2.122544.26198@sei.cmu.edu> <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 23:50:14 GMT Lines: 23