🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #11351

Re: reentrant

#11351
From: Michael Meissner
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 23:50
23 lines
1459 bytes
In article <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu> john@iastate.edu (John Hascall) writes:

| Perhaps the research world has been...
| But as far as (popular) commercially available OSes, it would seem not:
| 
|   MS-DOS:  not a chance
|      VMS:  nope
|      MVS:  sort of, but horrid
|       VM:  I dunno, and I hope never to find out ;-)
|     OS/2:  ditto
|     UNIX:  not yet
|    OSF/1:  yes, but not much of a commercial success at this point

Data General's propitary operating systems (R[TD]OS, AOS{,/VS,/VS-II}
have had threads (called tasks) since the 70's (early 70's I think).

Many of the multiprocessor UNIX versions have had threads in one form
or another, and certainly the MPP systems.
--
Michael Meissner	email: meissner@osf.org		phone: 617-621-8861
Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142

You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MEISSNER.93Jan3185011@curley.osf.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!meissner
References: <id.JY9W.Y64@ferranti.com> <C04zn2.A95.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1993Jan2.122544.26198@sei.cmu.edu> <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!meissner
From: meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner)
Subject: Re: reentrant
In-Reply-To: john@iastate.edu's message of 2 Jan 93 19:06:39 GMT
Message-ID: <MEISSNER.93Jan3185011@curley.osf.org>
Lines: 23
Sender: news@osf.org (USENET News System)
Organization: Open Software Foundation
References: <id.JY9W.Y64@ferranti.com> <C04zn2.A95.2@cs.cmu.edu>
 <1993Jan2.122544.26198@sei.cmu.edu> <C08qF4.Knz@news.iastate.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 23:50:14 GMT
Lines: 23