Re: Dynamic Ram Controller Chip

Article View: comp.arch

Article #12703

#12703

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1986 04:34

14 lines
1186 bytes

> ... the "pretranslation" looks like it
> falls under the Sun-Microsystems patent for strobing the low order address
> bits on the rams before the high order to get more time in memory management
> translation. Any problems with that?

Only if AT&T lost a patent-infringement suit by Sun, I'd think.  Considering
the relative size of the two companies and the relatively poor chances of
winning *any* patent-infringement action if the defendant is stubborn and
resourceful, Sun would be crazy to try.

[Beware:  I am not a lawyer.  Consult an expert before doing anything rash.]
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7407@utzoo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <7720@gatech.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.sys.m68k
Subject: Re: Dynamic Ram Controller Chip
Message-ID: <7407@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 13-Dec-86 23:34:58 EST
Article-I.D.: utzoo.7407
Posted: Sat Dec 13 23:34:58 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 13-Dec-86 23:34:58 EST
References: <7720@gatech.EDU>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message