Article View: comp.arch
Article #21120Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Mon, 08 May 1989 13:05
Date: Mon, 08 May 1989 13:05
14 lines
1124 bytes
1124 bytes
In article <907@aber-cs.UUCP>, pcg@aber-cs.UUCP (Piercarlo Grandi) writes: > As to some small bit of available evidence, it is not very controversial > that the 386 is usually a tad faster than the 68020 with roughly equivalent > system technology (e.g. a cached 386 at 20Mhz tipically beats a cached 68020 > at 25 Mhz under gcc), and code size is a tad smaller as well. Of course you realise you're comparing intel's latest production technology with Motorola's last-but-one generation. How does the 80386 compare to the 68030? -- Peter da Silva, Xenix Support, Ferranti International Controls Corporation. Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!peter, peter@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5180. Personal: ...!texbell!sugar!peter, peter@sugar.hackercorp.com.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4103@ficc.uu.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!peterReferences:
<907@aber-cs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size Message-ID: <4103@ficc.uu.net> Date: 8 May 89 13:05:09 GMT References: <907@aber-cs.UUCP> Distribution: eunet,world Organization: Xenix Support Lines: 14