Article View: comp.arch
Article #21175Re: Register usage [was Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size]
From: John Mashey
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 03:58
Date: Thu, 11 May 1989 03:58
14 lines
1128 bytes
1128 bytes
In article <25254@ames.arc.nasa.gov> lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) writes:
>still apply. It might be the case that 64 32-bit registers are a better fit
>for the suggested Fortran examples.
I don't have it handy, but a good example looking at the use of 64 regs
is:
David W. Wall, Global register Allocation at Link Time,
SIGPLAN NOTICES 21(7)264-275, July 1986.
--
-john mashey DISCLAIMER: <generic disclaimer, I speak for me only, etc>
UUCP: {ames,decwrl,prls,pyramid}!mips!mash OR mash@mips.com
DDD: 408-991-0253 or 408-720-1700, x253
USPS: MIPS Computer Systems, 930 E. Arques, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19410@winchester.mips.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!versatc!mips!mashReferences:
<926@aber-cs.UUCP> <25254@ames.arc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!apple!versatc!mips!mash From: mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Register usage [was Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size] Message-ID: <19410@winchester.mips.COM> Date: 11 May 89 03:58:05 GMT References: <926@aber-cs.UUCP> <25254@ames.arc.nasa.gov> Reply-To: mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) Distribution: eunet,world Organization: MIPS Computer Systems, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 14