Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size [really: how many regs]

Article View: comp.arch

Article #21366

#21366

From: Peter Brouwer
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 07:14

11 lines
1149 bytes

In article <8125@killer.Dallas.TX.US> elg@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Eric Green) writes:
>But there's one problem: Types. On a 68000, shorts and ints are 16
>bits, longs are 32 bits. What this means is that if I declare a
Are you sure this is correct? The compilers I have used work with shorts as
16 bits ( word ) and ints and longs as 32 bits ( long word ). The situation you
describe is used on the 8086 family as far as I know. ( Lattice c on MSDOS ).
-- 
#  Peter Brouwer,                     ##
#  Philips TDS, Dept SSP-V2           ## voice +31 55 432523
#  P.O. Box 245                       ## UUCP address ..!mcvax!philapd!pb
#  7300 AE Apeldoorn, The Netherlands ## Internet pb@idca.tds.philips.nl

Technical Details

Message-ID: <427@ssp2.idca.tds.philips.nl>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!philapd!ssp2!pb

References: <948@aber-cs.UUCP> <8125@killer.Dallas.TX.US>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!philapd!ssp2!pb
From: pb@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Peter Brouwer)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: 80486 vs. 68040 code size [really: how many regs]
Message-ID: <427@ssp2.idca.tds.philips.nl>
Date: 19 May 89 07:14:31 GMT
References: <948@aber-cs.UUCP> <8125@killer.Dallas.TX.US>
Distribution: eunet,world
Organization: Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems, The Netherlands
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message