68000 architecture

Article View: comp.arch

Article #21562

#21562

From: Gord Deinstadt
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1989 01:48

9 lines
844 bytes

In article <1989May30.171335.473@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>
>Just to be heretical, one can observe that the same thing is true of
>addresses.  You can run the 68k family with 16-bit addresses (although
>they have to be *signed* 16-bit addresses!).

Can anyone tell my why Motorola did such a twisted, sick thing?

Gord Deinstadt       gd@geovision.uucp

Technical Details

Message-ID: <658@geovision.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!geovision!gd

References: <1989May30.171335.473@utzoo.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!geovision!gd
From: gd@geovision.uucp (Gord Deinstadt)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: 68000 architecture
Summary: why signed?
Message-ID: <658@geovision.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jun 89 01:48:50 GMT
References: <1989May30.171335.473@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: gd@geovision.UUCP (Gord Deinstadt)
Organization: GeoVision Corp, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message