Article View: comp.arch
Article #21864Re: Integer Multiply/Divide on Sparc
From: jean-david.beyer
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1989 14:04
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1989 14:04
18 lines
1355 bytes
1355 bytes
As I recall, the Naval Ordonance Research Computer (NORC) had a completely combinatorial multiplier: it could do a 10 digit by 10 digit multiply in the same number of cycles as an add. My recollection is that the multiplier box took a refrigerator size box. The rest of the cpu took another refrigerator size box. And that was in vacuum tube days. So multiply instructions need take no longer than the total number of gate delays to make such a thing. The main design question remains: for the kind of work to be done with the processor, is that the best place to put the complexity and delays and chip area. One must know the work to be done; i.e, the benchmarks to be run (and whether they are really representative of the work to be run). -- Jean-David Beyer AT&T Bell Laboratories Holmdel, New Jersey, 07733 attunix!beyer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6928@cbnewsh.ATT.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!cbnewsh!beyerReferences:
<84768@linus.UUCP> <8840004@hpfcso.HP.COM> <84983@linus.UUCP> <34000@mips.mips.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!cbnewsh!beyer From: beyer@cbnewsh.ATT.COM (jean-david.beyer) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Integer Multiply/Divide on Sparc Summary: If you are willing to spend the money, complexity, chip area... Message-ID: <6928@cbnewsh.ATT.COM> Date: 29 Dec 89 14:04:18 GMT References: <84768@linus.UUCP> <8840004@hpfcso.HP.COM> <84983@linus.UUCP> <34000@mips.mips.COM> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 18