🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.arch
Article #22546

Evolution towards super-scalar

#22546
From: David Robinson
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1990 01:07
19 lines
1298 bytes
What are the limits of moving existing architectures such as SPARC and
MIPS towards super-scalar and maintaining binary compatibility?

A simplistic approach would be to simply fetch 2 or more instructions
at once and decode/dispatch them in parallel if possible.  Existing
binary code would probably not be optimal but would probably work.
New compilers with better scheduling algorithms could take advantage
the the new parallelism.

I sounds simple so I must be missing something or are existing "RISC"
architectures going to have to change substantially if they want to
get into the super-scalar game? (Assuming they want to)

	-David
-- 
David Robinson	david@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov 	{decwrl,usc,ames}!elroy!david
Disclaimer: No one listens to me anyway!
"Once a new technology rolls over you, if your not part of the steamroller,
 you're part of the road." - Stewart Brand
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.010728.26641@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!david

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!david
From: david@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (David Robinson)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Evolution towards super-scalar
Message-ID: <1990Feb23.010728.26641@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: 23 Feb 90 01:07:28 GMT
Sender: david@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (David Robinson)
Organization: Image Analysis Systems Grp, JPL
Lines: 19