Article View: comp.arch
Article #3228Re: GaAs considered dead , indium phosphide, rod logic?
From: Jeff d'Arcy
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1989 21:27
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1989 21:27
12 lines
1036 bytes
1036 bytes
From article <1376@argus.UUCP>, by ken@argus.UUCP (Kenneth Ng): > Hm, indium phosphide I once heard that mentioned by Cray (yes that > Cray), but I never heard of nanotechnology rod logic. Is it real > or is it a joke of some kind? Does anyone know of anyone working > with indium phosphide at least? While we're at it, what is "ballistic transistor" technology. I see images of microchips with little microrocket engines, but somehow I don't think that's what ER was talking about. Jeff d'Arcy OS/Network Software Engineer jdarcy@encore.com Encore has provided the medium, but the message remains my own
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10508@encore.Encore.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!bu-cs!encore!pinocchio.encore.comReferences:
<1376@argus.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!bu-cs!encore!pinocchio.encore.com From: jdarcy@pinocchio.encore.com (Jeff d'Arcy) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: GaAs considered dead , indium phosphide, rod logic? Message-ID: <10508@encore.Encore.COM> Date: 30 Nov 89 21:27:27 GMT References: <1376@argus.UUCP> Sender: news@Encore.COM Lines: 12