Article View: comp.dcom.lans.misc
Article #329Re: building wiring
From: John K. Scoggin, Jr.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 12:53
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 12:53
58 lines
3369 bytes
3369 bytes
In article 9AF@ra.nrl.navy.mil, atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Randall Atkinson) writes: > [ redirected discussion from comp.protocols.tcp-ip :-] > > In article <1993Jan24.231044.16138@xenitec.on.ca> merce@xenitec.on.ca (Jim Mercer) writes: > > >for new buildings, [coax is] dead, except for the possibiliy of backbone > >pulls of thick coax to connect wiring centres, but then you might consider > >fiber. > > Actually, I happen to be planning for a 1995 building and we are > sure that our backbones will be fiber. However, we expect to continue > to have a large installed base of workstations that want a thin-net > Ethernet coax connection and do not plan that twisted pair will be > enough. > > The harder question is which kind of fiber to install. So our > backbone plans have both single-mode and multi-mode fiber. The > distribution within the floors will be decided upon later so we have > time to figure out what we want. > > >for existing buildings, if you are pulling new cable, pull UTP. you > >will probably save some money on media. you will spend it later in hubs. > > Actually most of the cost of cabling installation is in the labor, > so it would be much wiser to put in Shielded Twisted Pair (STP), with > 2 pair of wires per outlet. NB: Anything that will run over UTP will > also run over STP, but the reverse is NOT true. STP is wisest and > gives the most flexibility, with little real cost difference from UTP > when you figure in installation costs. > This is NOT true. STP has a different impedance than UTP. We made the mistake of wiring two large buildings with IBM Type 2 (STP) cable. We have had problems running 10BaseT over long (75-100 meters) distances as a result. Believe me, there is a BIG difference in cost between UTP and STP if you have to use plenum- rated cable (Teflon)... > >2) What options are available for small (less than a dozen nodes) networks > >currently running coax and wanting to move to 10BaseT? > > If really small, then why not just use continue to use what you have > where you have it, move to STP for new locations and add > tranceivers/T-joints where there are new drops in existing coax > locations. > --- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | John K. Scoggin, Jr. Email: scoggin@delmarva.com | | Supervisor, Network Operations Phone: (302) 451-5200 | | Delmarva Power & Light Company Fax: (302) 451-5321 | | 500 N. Wakefield Drive NOC: (800) 388-7076 | | Newark, DE 19714-6066 | | The opinions expressed are not those of Delmarva Power, simply the | | product of an over-active imagination... | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k0nsgINNlvr@blackhole.delmarva.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!blackhole.delmarva.com!mercury!scogginReferences:
<C1Dt40.9AF@ra.nrl.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!blackhole.delmarva.com!mercury!scoggin From: scoggin@delmarva.com (John K. Scoggin, Jr.) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.misc Subject: Re: building wiring Date: 25 Jan 1993 12:53:36 GMT Organization: Delmarva Power & Light Company Lines: 59 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1k0nsgINNlvr@blackhole.delmarva.com> References: <C1Dt40.9AF@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Reply-To: scoggin@delmarva.com NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.delmarva.com