Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #247Re: "@Home Subscribers Angered By New Policies"
From: Philip J. Koenig
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:00
63 lines
3343 bytes
3343 bytes
In article <7c7l1g$5ba$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com>, gerg@shell1.ncal.verio.com writes... > For_Email@ddress.see.below_plea.se (Phil Koenig) writes: > >In article <7c4uuc$5tl$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com>, gerg@shell1.ncal.verio.com > >writes... > >> For_Email@ddress.see.below_plea.se (Phil Koenig) writes: > >> > > >> >Last I heard, T-1 etc. connections to major backbone providers > >> >were going UP in price, not down. > >> > > >> > >> Really? Quest (or is it Qwest?) isn't offering high-speed > >> connections for less than Alternet/Sprint/GTE, etc.? > >> > > > >Even if true, is Qwest the only company that any ISP ever buys > >transit/connectivity from? I daresay they are not yet a > >majority player in the market. > > > >Things may be different in a couple of years, but we're > >talking about prices for DSL/cable customers NOW. > > > > Forgive me, but I understood the phrase "...were going up in price..." > as indicating a trend that has been occurring *over time*, with the > implication that the trend will continue through the future. > > Qwest certainly isn't a majority player yet, but that doesn't mean > they can't have an effect on the market, does it? > > -Greg Sorry, didn't mean to imply that this trend is supposed to last for the forseeable future. I simply meant to point out that unlike so many other things in the computer world (memory prices, disk prices, CPU prices, etc.) you are not seeing similiar kinds of mass price erosion in transit/backbone connectivity.. on the contrary the trend (AFAIK) has been upward. I have no doubt the prices will fall, they just aren't falling much YET. And since they haven't yet fallen on the backbone side, the prospect of people getting all this T-1 bandwidth for $50/mo. *reliably* and *consistently* just isn't extremely likely for a while. Sure the early adopters are seeing some nice performance, but (as happened w/ @home) that isn't bound to last for the greater masses as more get hooked up. (until there is a major paradigm shift on the backbone side) -- Philip J. Koenig The Electric Kahuna Organization [see below] -----------------Computers & Communications for the New Millenium------------- References to my email address in this message have been modified to foil address-collection robots. If you wish to send email, use the following address by removing numbers and spaces: pjkunet64 @ ekahuna27 . c o m
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.1153c7f7238780c89896c2@news.walltech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36d82cdd.72603808@news> <MPG.114f8789e396b0939896b7@news.walltech.com> <7c4uuc$5tl$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com> <MPG.114ff41ebf0101e19896bb@news.walltech.com> <7c7l1g$5ba$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa874,e4675da7edf5879e X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,e4675da7edf5879e X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public From: For_Email@ddress.see.below_plea.se (Philip J. Koenig) Subject: Re: "@Home Subscribers Angered By New Policies" Date: 1999/03/13 Message-ID: <MPG.1153c7f7238780c89896c2@news.walltech.com> X-Deja-AN: 454489046 References: <36d82cdd.72603808@news> <MPG.114f8789e396b0939896b7@news.walltech.com> <7c4uuc$5tl$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com> <MPG.114ff41ebf0101e19896bb@news.walltech.com> <7c7l1g$5ba$1@shell1.ncal.verio.com> X-Trace: news7.ispnews.com 921315354 170.1.21.197 (Sat, 13 Mar 1999 03:55:54 EDT) Organization: Computers & Communications NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 03:55:54 EDT Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,ba.internet