Article View: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Article #790Re: Cable modem questions...
From: Barry Mac
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 00:00
115 lines
5400 bytes
5400 bytes
Thanks for your help Bryan... however the tech support rep was uncooperative... not over yet though! Barry "Bryan Laird" <ducky@rcn.com> wrote in message news:slrn8kfl6u.j93.ducky@shell1.darkwing.net... > > If you have swapped the NIC card for the computer you changed the MAC > address. If you tried changing the computer when it was working it may have > broke it. Depending on the IOS they are running (ofcourse this depends on > if they are running UBR's in your area and if it is a docsis system) you > could have them do > sh int (interface) modem 0 and find your sid. Then check to see if > the MAC address for the computer matches the one that you actually have. If > it doesn't have them clear it > > (clear cable host xxxx.xxxx.xxxx). > > Only reason I am even mentioning this is I have seen a few cases where the > client HOST got "stuck" on the headend and was not updating the way that it > should. > > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:53:39 -0400, Barry Mac <barrymac@interlog.com> wrote: > >Hi Mirage, > > > >I notice you had trouble with @home. I am currently in a tech support loop > >going nowhere > >trying to get my network connection back. It was fully functioning out of > >the box, but then a few days later I can't find the DHCP server. I've > >swapped Ethernet cards and cables, tried static IP address, reinstalled > >TCP/IP, updated Internet Explorer. > > > >I still have my dial-up connection, and had successfully set up both the > >dial-up > >and the Internet Explorer to work with both. > > > >@Home assumes me there is no problem with their 1meg modem because > >apparently they can run diagnostics on it. It seems to be running rather > >hot though. > > > >Can you suggest anything? > > > >Thanks, > >Barry > > > > > > > >"Mirage" <mirage@nospam.net> wrote in message > >news:dtarjsoc4vfp925me5a5q9i3to98pgmk25@4ax.com... > >> Generally, a PCI card is better because they are able to engage in IRQ > >> sharing, meaning you don't have to have a dedicated IRQ free like you > >> would with an ISA card - in general. > >> > >> Essentially - you don't need them to install *any* software > >> whatsoever, and it is usually harder to try and uninstall a > >> proprietary form of IE because IE 4.x and above are so closely > >> intertwined with Windoze to begin with. In summary - other than > >> ethernet card drivers, the tech doesn't need to install any software - > >> the service will work just as good (probably better). > >> > >> If you can afford the cost, go get a PCI ethernet card (3Com, Intel, > >> SMC are good brands). If you install the ethernet card beforehand, > >> the only thing the tech will *need* (not *want*) to do is configure > >> the card (IP address, subnet mask, etc.) and physically connect the > >> modem and the card. > >> > >> I'm kind of a rabid opponent of the @home data technicians (due to my > >> own personal experiences with them), but if you can swing it, after > >> the RF tech installs the modem to your wall jack, it might be better > >> to simply meet the data tech at the door, grab the configuration > >> sheet, and send him on his way - unfortunately, this may not be > >> possible. > >> > >> Now - the tech who came out (erroneously) to *install* a cable modem > >> as a result of my trouble call on my existing modem instilled much > >> more confidence: One guy, doing both the RF and the card/software > >> install, and capable of "talking shop" with me (i.e. signal strengths, > >> that the customer service techs seem to be brain-dead at times, etc.) > >> > >> Oh well - good luck. > >> > >> On Tue, 06 Jun 2000 23:55:33 GMT, curley498 <ask@me.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hi! > >> > > >> >I am getting a cable modem installed this friday, and I have a couple > >> >of questions. I have an option of a PCI or ISA card to be installed > >> >and connected to the cable modem, and I am wondering which one is > >> >better, and why. > >> > > >> >Also, I have heard something about the @home service installing > >> >"spyware", and not to let them install it. Is this true? I won't be > >> >there during the installation, so is there a way to uninstall/block > >> >the software once it has been installed? Will the service still work > >> >just as good if the technician doesn't installt the software? > >> > > >> >Thanks in advance for your help! > >> >Joe. > >> > > > > > > > -- > Bryan Laird > Senior Engineer RCN Cable Data Network
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MDf35.17195$Ip.448893@cac1.rdr.news.psi.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<vn3rjsoh78fr076sntivf0ugf552l6kod3@4ax.com> <dtarjsoc4vfp925me5a5q9i3to98pgmk25@4ax.com> <Nsu15.13882$Ip.411036@cac1.rdr.news.psi.ca> <slrn8kfl6u.j93.ducky@shell1.darkwing.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10c8f2,a86fc362d2902a7c X-Google-Attributes: gid10c8f2,public X-Google-Thread: 113850,a86fc362d2902a7c X-Google-Attributes: gid113850,public From: "Barry Mac" <barrymac@yourmama.com> Subject: Re: Cable modem questions... Date: 2000/06/18 Message-ID: <MDf35.17195$Ip.448893@cac1.rdr.news.psi.ca> X-Deja-AN: 636214683 References: <vn3rjsoh78fr076sntivf0ugf552l6kod3@4ax.com> <dtarjsoc4vfp925me5a5q9i3to98pgmk25@4ax.com> <Nsu15.13882$Ip.411036@cac1.rdr.news.psi.ca> <slrn8kfl6u.j93.ducky@shell1.darkwing.net> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Trace: cac1.rdr.news.psi.ca 961381996 154.5.83.104 (Sun, 18 Jun 2000 22:33:16 EDT) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 22:33:16 EDT Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems.cable,can.internet.highspeed