BGP Status...

Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco

Article #105

Back to comp.dcom.sys.cisco Previous Next

#105

From: Tim Salo
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 17:18

34 lines
1312 bytes

I don't know if you intended to send your mail to the whole list, but
others may be interested in our experience.

By the way, what is the status of Cisco's BGP implementation?

-tjs

-----------

> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 92 23:22:37 -0700
> From: Gary Kunis <gkunis@cisco.com>
> To: cisco@spot.colorado.edu
> Subject: Re: <1992Jun24.204917.11184@uc.msc.edu>
> 
> Jeff,
> BGP is not broken,  It works fine in releases 9.0(1) and 8.3(3).
> Where did you pick up this rumor - and do you know what release
> was being talked about?
> 
> >The last rumor/word I heard on Cisco's BGP implementation was 
> >that its broken.   Is this true?  Word from cisco on when they
> >expect to make it un-broken?

------------

> From: jwabik (Jeff Wabik)
> Subject: NSFNet to T3:  Portrait of a failure
> To: comm@msc.edu
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 92 8:44:19 CDT
> 
> Both ciscos blew their cookies when they started to listen to routes
> from MERIT via BGP.   .,. it took us almost 2 hours to get the universe
> back into working order.
> 	[...]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9208071718.AA13580@noc.msc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!boulder!recnews

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!boulder!recnews
From: tjs@msc.edu (Tim Salo)
Subject: BGP Status...
Message-ID: <9208071718.AA13580@noc.msc.edu>
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Date: 7 Aug 92 12:18:51 -0500
Lines: 34