Article View: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Article #1933Re: ISDN BRI B-Channel aggregation
From: Steve Lilley
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 06:41
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 06:41
21 lines
1428 bytes
1428 bytes
>I am running IOS 10.3(6) at the central site. I am able to get >cisco 1003 and 1004 routers to dial in on two channels with >no problem. What aggregation method is being used there? Is it >something proprietary to cisco? Will BONDING ever be supported by >cisco? Is there anything besides Multilink PPP and BONDING being used? Let's see: it's proprietary; yes; no; yes. ;-) The Cisco implementation is strictly propriety...I don't even think the old Combinets (now 750s) can connect at more than one B channel. Cisco decided over a year ago that their implementation for "bonded" B channels was as good or better than the emerging MP...so I guess they haven't concentrated on it. Pity, isn't it? :-( Signed a usually satisfied Cisco customer (and reseller), Steve slilley@fast.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30D7AFFC.3DDB@fast.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sprintlink.net!fastnet!newsReferences:
<srp336-1212951858410001@spfister.optimum.com> <4b2nfu$1d1@news.worldlinx.com> <srp336-1912951954140001@spfister.optimum.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sprintlink.net!fastnet!news From: Steve Lilley <slilley@fast.net> Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco,comp.dcom.isdn Subject: Re: ISDN BRI B-Channel aggregation Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 22:41:00 -0800 Organization: FASTNET(tm) PA/NJ/DE Internet Message-ID: <30D7AFFC.3DDB@fast.net> References: <srp336-1212951858410001@spfister.optimum.com> <4b2nfu$1d1@news.worldlinx.com> <srp336-1912951954140001@spfister.optimum.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: slilley.fast.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b2a (Windows; I; 16bit)