Article View: comp.dsp
Article #1535TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested
From: Harihara Moorthy
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1991 05:46
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1991 05:46
29 lines
1492 bytes
1492 bytes
Hi: We are considering developing a board for voice applications, and have narrowed down the choice of the dsp processor to TMS32031 and Motorola56001. We are inclining towards 32031 for the following reasons: faster, both floating and integer arithmetic, more on-chip memory, and possibly cheaper. We would like the chip to reasonably meet our future needs which might include voice recognition, fax transmission etc. I would appreciate your input on how these two chips compare. Also, can someone identify applications where floating point dsp processor will be esspecially needed. Finally, what are the advantages and disadvantages of floating point calculations vs fixed point calculations? Thanks. Please email your responses (or post) to moorthy@saturn.ucsc.edu If there is enough interest, I will summarize. H. Moorthy -- ___ / (_) o o ___ | . _ ___ ___ _|_ \ Harihara SV Moorthy | | | | | | _|_|_ _|_|_ | Univ. of California, Santa Cruz
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<13192@darkstar.ucsc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!darkstar!saturn.ucsc.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!darkstar!saturn.ucsc.edu From: moorthy@saturn.ucsc.edu (Harihara Moorthy) Newsgroups: comp.dsp Subject: TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested Keywords: how do these compare? Message-ID: <13192@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 8 Mar 91 05:46:53 GMT Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Distribution: usa Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz Lines: 29