Article View: comp.dsp
Article #2355Re: Telecommunications-Terminal-Equipment-Directive does not discuss EDTN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
From: Don Bowey
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:39
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:39
73 lines
5440 bytes
5440 bytes
On 9/28/07 9:12 PM, in article 46fdce2c$0$32511$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
"Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:
> Don Bowey wrote:
>
>> On 9/28/07 6:45 PM, in article 46fdabe3$0$7455$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
>> "Green Xenon [Radium]" <glucegen1@excite.com> wrote:
>
>>> If EDTN stood for �European Deaf Telephone Network�, then my search
>>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22European+Deaf+Telephone+Network%22&b
>>> tn
>>> G=Google+Search
>>> would describe how EDTN works and provide me with EDTN numbers which I
>>> could dial so I could listen to EDTN tones from Switzerland!!!!!!!!!!
>
>> Why do you think that?
>
> Because usually it would. Not always but usually.
>
>>> Sadly, EDTN does not stand for �European Deaf Telephone
>>> Network� when relating to textphone terminology.
>
>> No, but I found a good reference to European Deaf Telephone (EDT).
>
> Thanks but I already know about EDT. What does EDTN stand for?
>
>>> Dial 1-800-543-1586 and you'll hear the American TDD tones I am talking
>>> about. This is an example of a TDD number used in the United States. I
>>> want to hear the Swiss-equivalent of TDD.
>
>> According to what I found, the Swiss use the ETN protocol of V.18. Here is
>> a list you might want:
>>
>> � Baudot @ 45.45 baud (U.S. TTYs)
>> � Baudot @ 50 baud (used in England, Australia, and some other
>> countries; also known as "international" Baudot)
>> � V.21/text telephone version (used in Sweden, Norway, and Finland).
>> � DTMF (used in Denmark, Holland, and some other countries)
>> � EDT ("European Deaf Telephone," used in Germany, Austria,
>> Switzerland, and several other countries)
>
> Thanks but I already knew all of the above. I would like to know what
> EDTN stands for. Why does a simple question have to get so complicated?
>
>>> What modulation scheme does EDTN use? FSK? QAM? Something else? What?
Why are you still asking this, when you now say all you want to know is the
meaning of EDTN? You have been given the essential parts to know the
answers.
>>
>>
>> If you would apply yourself, you could know all.......
>>
>> Maybe you should look for a terminal program that is compatible with the
>> protocols in the list. Then you could listen to them all you wish. Just
>> don't come back here asking us to find it for you.
>
> I've tried asking www.madsci.org which always rejects my EDTN questions.
> I've also tried asking www.allexperts.com which often respond with "This
> is out of my expertise".
>
> After doing my own toilsome research and even asking those so-called
> "experts", I am still not able to find what the EDTN acronym stands for.
Perhaps it is because you want the answer to be phrased a certain way, and
you are unwilling to see it in it's parts.
>
> This is why my posts are not so polite.
That is a poor excuse. I asked a doctor friend about AS..... It should be
within your ability to control yourself better.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C323330A.78DE9%dbowey@comcast.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<46fd2830$0$32509$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <5m4pleFble9qU1@mid.individual.net> <46fd3f93$0$20627$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C322965E.78C95%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fd5116$0$11008$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C322A214.78CC0%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fdabe3$0$7455$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C3230C52.78DA5%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fdce2c$0$32511$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 111d0a,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: faa3c,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 114575,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 10078a,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Thread: 10408d,371367577fa1a2de X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,gidfb1f8,gid10d85e,gid111d0a,gid112d1e,gidfaa3c,gid114575,gid10078a,gid10408d,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:39:08 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:39:06 -0700 Subject: Re: Telecommunications-Terminal-Equipment-Directive does not discuss EDTN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! From: Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> Newsgroups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.opinion,sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.design,24hoursupport.helpdesk,uk.telecom,uk.people.deaf,alt.society.deaf Message-ID: <C323330A.78DE9%dbowey@comcast.net> References: <46fd2830$0$32509$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <5m4pleFble9qU1@mid.individual.net> <46fd3f93$0$20627$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C322965E.78C95%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fd5116$0$11008$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C322A214.78CC0%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fdabe3$0$7455$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <C3230C52.78DA5%dbowey@comcast.net> <46fdce2c$0$32511$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Lines: 74 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.168.207.249 X-Trace: sv3-xjwrw9w2Pa+v5E7YLgNoPTEDbCS0o/l7wFViz1MFt05rPcyHF2I/Tw2GBR24xR2eBJZoTyh6EYzzOD3!qkFJ9qtcsABNa5ZQ24Qg8PuIGhNq6hlUcrqYueipJCGAK5nrgjOc9ndLD+rj64SIi+mJWEnMlSzs!310WKeNuNUgJo1u2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.35