🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.dsp
Article #829

Re: DSP for feedback control

#829
From: Brian Hanafee
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 1990 01:02
20 lines
1397 bytes
In article <4762@uafhp.uark.edu> cdc@uafhcx.uucp (C. D. Covington) writes:

> [Much stuff deleted]  They call impulse response an echogram and
>measure it in European concert halls using a 9mm blank pistol!
>
When I took the course in acoustics, I was told that popping a large
balloon works much better than a pistol, because the frequency
distribution is beter.  Gunshots are somewhat deficient in the low
end of frequency.

I also want to point out that there are really two implementations
of this device (feedback assassin) that we could be discussing:
the first is a big, expensive version that sound companies would
want to buy, with complete tweaking of all the parameters.  The
cheaper alternative might be a "black box" which does nothing more
than look for frequency spikes and attenuate them.  This could be
very useful for cases when sound quality is less important than
not having feedback.

Brian Hanafee
Technical Details
Message-ID: <B&?$~!$@ads.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!ames!ads.com!bhanafee
References: <539@skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov> <4762@uafhp.uark.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!ames!ads.com!bhanafee
From: bhanafee@ADS.COM (Brian Hanafee)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Re: DSP for feedback control
Message-ID: <B&?$~!$@ads.com>
Date: 13 Jun 90 01:02:24 GMT
References: <539@skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov> <4762@uafhp.uark.edu>
Sender: usenet@ads.com (USENET News)
Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mt. View, CA (415) 960-7300
Lines: 20