🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

4 total messages Started by Harihara Moorthy Fri, 08 Mar 1991 05:46
TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested
#1535
Author: Harihara Moorthy
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1991 05:46
29 lines
1492 bytes
Hi:

We are considering developing a board for voice applications, and have
narrowed down the choice of the dsp processor to TMS32031 and Motorola56001.
We are inclining towards 32031 for the following reasons: faster, both
floating and integer arithmetic, more on-chip memory, and possibly
cheaper.  We would like the chip to reasonably meet our future needs which
might include voice recognition, fax transmission etc.  I would appreciate
your input on how these two chips compare.

Also, can someone identify applications where floating point dsp processor
will be esspecially needed.

Finally, what are the advantages and disadvantages of floating point
calculations vs fixed point calculations?

Thanks.

Please email your responses (or post) to moorthy@saturn.ucsc.edu
If there is enough interest, I will summarize.

H. Moorthy

--
 ___    
/ (_)      o     o        ___
| .   _   ___   ___     _|_  \ Harihara SV Moorthy
| |  | | | |  _|_|_   _|_|_  | Univ. of California, Santa Cruz
Re: TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested
#1586
Author: Andrew E Page
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 18:39
40 lines
2123 bytes
In article <13192@darkstar.ucsc.edu> moorthy@saturn.ucsc.edu (Harihara Moorthy) writes:
>
>Hi:
>
>We are considering developing a board for voice applications, and have
>narrowed down the choice of the dsp processor to TMS32031 and Motorola56001.
>We are inclining towards 32031 for the following reasons: faster, both
>floating and integer arithmetic, more on-chip memory, and possibly
>cheaper.  We would like the chip to reasonably meet our future needs which
>might include voice recognition, fax transmission etc.  I would appreciate
>your input on how these two chips compare.

  I don't know about cheaper.  The last time I was princing C30 chips 
they were running $270.  in quantity.  However, the C31-27 could be 
significantly cheaper.  Call your local reps about that.  

   My preference is towards the C3x as well.  Much of my DSP expertise
was cut with this device.  IN addition I like the feature of the dual
busses in the same memory address space.  This saves a lot of hassles
in coding and design.    
    I'm not sure, but I do not think that the 56K supports the following 
features that the C30 does:

	a)  parallel instructions
        b)  serial ports (2 for the C30, 1 for the C31)


>
>Also, can someone identify applications where floating point dsp processor
>will be esspecially needed.

  Graphics, particularly maldebrot fractals.  




-- 
Andrew E. Page (Warrior Poet)   |   Decision and Effort The Archer and Arrow
Concepts Engineering            |     The difference between what we are
CIS:70202,234  BIX:page1        |           and what we want to be.
Re: TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested
#1588
Author: Brian Hanafee
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 20:18
20 lines
1503 bytes
In article <1991Mar19.183918.6460@world.std.com> aep@world.std.com (Andrew E Page) writes:

>In article <13192@darkstar.ucsc.edu> moorthy@saturn.ucsc.edu (Harihara Moorthy) writes:
>    I'm not sure, but I do not think that the 56K supports the following 
>features that the C30 does:
>
>   a)  parallel instructions
The 56k basically allows a parallel data move instruction.  It's
mainly useful for setting up registers in advance;  the parallel moves
often get bottlenecked by the data bus anyway.

>   b)  serial ports (2 for the C30, 1 for the C31)

The 56k has 2 serial ports and a parallel port.  It can generate baud
rates internally.  Actually, I think the interfacing capabilities are
one of its strong points.  The Motorola documentation of those
capabilities is not one of its strong points.


Brian Hanafee
Re: TMS32031 - vs - Motorola56001, information requested
#1593
Author: Jeff Carroll
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1991 02:45
20 lines
1194 bytes
In article <1991Mar19.183918.6460@world.std.com> aep@world.std.com (Andrew E Page) writes:
>
>    I'm not sure, but I do not think that the 56K supports the following 
>features that the C30 does:
>
>	a)  parallel instructions
>        b)  serial ports (2 for the C30, 1 for the C31)

a)	the 56000/56001 supports "parallel moves", i.e., the move
	instructions can under  some circumstances be executed in parallel
	with ALU ops.

b)	the 56000/56001 has three reconfigurable I/O ports, two of which
	can be used as serial ports.



-- 
Jeff Carroll
carroll@ssc-vax.boeing.com
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads