Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs?

Article View: comp.editors

Article #3975

#3975

From: Vladimir Alexiev
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 00:00

15 lines
1440 bytes

In article <vafd92hzr3e.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> Kai Grossjohann <grossjoh@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> Now that I've reverted back to the default summary line format, it's
> better, but back when I included the date in the summary line --
> rather slow.

What could be the  reason for this?
- does the NOV format include dates? Otherwise Gnus would have to fetch
  full headers to get the date.
- have you complied with the requirement to keep the format relatively
  "fixed" (flags positions should not change), eg by using a fixed-length
  date field.
- have you compiled your new format spec? (I think this first appeared in
  Gnus 5.2)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <omhgrr8zlr.fsf@tees.cs.ualberta.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <4quo35$8qv@murrow.corp.sgi.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102b9a,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b9a,public
X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public
X-Google-Thread: 107393,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid107393,public
From: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir@cs.ualberta.ca>
Subject: Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs?
Date: 1996/07/01
Message-ID: <omhgrr8zlr.fsf@tees.cs.ualberta.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 163158131
distribution: inet
sender: vladimir@tees.cs.ualberta.ca
references: <4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <4quo35$8qv@murrow.corp.sgi.com>
followup-to: comp.emacs
organization: University of Alberta, Computing Science
newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help

Reply to Parent Message