🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.editors
Article #3976

Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs?

#3976
From: Bill Richter
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 00:00
88 lines
3403 bytes
In article <m2hgrs5sd1.fsf@mol.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
dak@neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (David Kastrup) writes:

    David> I don't know why I even have switched from ed.

If you're thinking of switching back, see emacs-19.31/etc/JOKES,
excerpted below.  I guess WYGIWYG means What You Get Is What You Get,
possibly an improvement over What You See Is All You'll Ever Get.

From: patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti)

When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi
*and* Emacs are just too damn slow.  They print useless messages like,
'C-h for help' and '"foo" File is read only'.  So I use the editor
that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.

And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair.  Just look:

- -rwxr-xr-x  1 root          24 Oct 29  1929 /bin/ed
- -rwxr-xr-t  4 root     1310720 Jan  1  1970 /usr/ucb/vi
- -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  5.89824e37 Oct 22  1990 /usr/bin/emacs

Of course, on the system *I* administrate, vi is symlinked to ed.
Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog
message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K;
and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!

"Ed is the standard text editor."

Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:

golem> ed

?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello? 
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?

- ---
Note the consistent user interface and error reportage.  Ed is
generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm
the novice with verbosity.

"Ed is the standard text editor."

Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.

ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA!  ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED
AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES!  ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS
BODILY FLUIDS!!  ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR!  ED MAKES THE SUN
SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
help screens and cursor positioning code!  I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "viitor".  Not a "emacsitor".  Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED!
ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

TEXT EDITOR.

When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their
"edlin" on a UNIX standard, did they mimic vi?  No.  Emacs?  Surely
you jest.  They chose the most karmic editor of all.  The standard.

Ed is for those who can *remember* what they are working on.  If you
are an idiot, you should use Emacs.  If you are an Emacs, you should
not be vi.  If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION.  THE
SO-CALLED "VISUAL" EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE
FAITHLESS.  DO NOT GIVE IN!!!  THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!

?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <vaohlzqged.fsf@dehn.math.nwu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <31D2A134.446B@igd.fhg.de> 09: 45:46 +0200

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103b8b,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103b8b,public
X-Google-Thread: 107393,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid107393,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b9a,51d854ca9043b00f
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b9a,public
From: richter@dehn.math.nwu.edu (Bill Richter)
Subject: Re: is it really worth the time to go from vi to emacs?
Date: 1996/07/02
Message-ID: <vaohlzqged.fsf@dehn.math.nwu.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 163247531
distribution: inet
references: <4qf5lo$lhk@knot.queensu.ca> <31D2A134.446B@igd.fhg.de>
 09: 45:46 +0200
organization: Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, US
newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.emacs,gnu.emacs.help