🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.graphics.animation
Article #817

Re: 3D Studio vs. Lightwave

#817
From: Don Burnett
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 16:11
58 lines
3105 bytes
In article <1imlfgINNss3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aa794@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Pete Nofel) writes:
>
>	One of the contributors to the "Imagine . . ." string asked for a
>comparison of Autodesk 3D Studio to Imagine. While my experience with
>Imagine is limited (I prefer Video Toaster Lightwave), I'd have to say that
>Amiga 3D packages usually produce better images. But, 3D Studio has some
>advantages.

  One advantage to Imagine is it's more sophisticated motion capabilities,
  although the interface is not designed for artists, but computer people 

>	3D Studio Advantages: A good user interface for object
>construction; I find it more straight-forward than Lightwave Modeler. A
>great interface with AutoCAD. The ability to play animations in real-time
>(but not at 30 fps).

  Good modeler. I don't think the user interface is as nice as others 
  out there, although useable.. I think the best interface on the market
  is a program called Caligari24 for the Amiga.. This guy did it right.
  It does realtime wireframe on even ancient 68000 based machines..


>	3D Studio Disadvantages: Price -- you can get a complete Video
>Toaster for the price of 3D Studio. "Hiddens" on the part of Autodesk -- no
>matter how many pieces of equipment you buy, you always need one more.
>After we invested $5,000 in an existing 486-33 in software and equipment we
>found that we still needed to drop another $2K - $5K to get quality images
>to video tape (broadcast quality, that is). Low resolution -- 3D Studio
>colors are nice, but resolution is limited to 320 x 200 in VGA; circles
>look like stop signs. Lighting control is medium-to-poor.

 That price is coming down and may even now be unrealistic, in terms of
 scan converters, etc. The video equipment is coming down.. I think 
 3D Studio was done by Thom Hudson who started 3D software life on the 
 Atari ST.

=DonB=

>	As much as I prefer MS-DOS machines for DTP, CAD, word processing,
>and structured drawing, they are poor video machines. By the time you have
>invested in a 486, a video i/o card, a frame buffer card, and software, you
>could have purchased an Amiga/Toaster and two quality VTRs and a camera.
>	We now only use 3D Studio as a pass-through in translating AutoCAD
>drawings into Lightwave.
>
>-- 
>Pete Nofel, aa794, primary sysop
>It's a Mystery - The Mystery Literature Group
>Cleveland Freenet, Cleveland Ohio


-- 
******************************************************
dburnett@emunix.emich.edu
EMU Mathematics Lab Consultant
Enabling Solutions
PO BOX 318, Ypsilanti, MI  48198
*****************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.161100.14619@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!umeecs!emunix.emich.edu!dburnett
References: <1imlfgINNss3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.animation
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!umeecs!emunix.emich.edu!dburnett
From: dburnett@emunix.emich.edu (Don Burnett)
Subject: Re: 3D Studio vs. Lightwave
Message-ID: <1993Jan12.161100.14619@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
Sender: news@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Mr. News)
Organization: Eastern Michigan University
References: <1imlfgINNss3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 16:11:00 GMT
Lines: 59