DirectX vs OpenGL

Article View: comp.graphics.api.opengl

Article #29

Back to comp.graphics.api.opengl Previous Next

#29

From: Dean Siren
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 00:00

5 lines
1050 bytes

Since Epic chose DirectX over OpenGL, is that a sign that the OpenGL consortium
aught to speed up R&D to keep open-source the most practical solution?  How
about integrating OpenGL with OpenAL?  Doesn't DirectX extend beyond graphics
and sound to include IPs and other technologies?  How has open-source come to
lag?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <si0i5gdlrj0182@corp.supernews.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 105253,444edbbae0de76e4,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid105253,public
X-Google-Thread: f65bb,444edbbae0de76e4,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf65bb,public
X-Google-Thread: 100291,444edbbae0de76e4,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid100291,public
From: "Dean Siren" <das@iu.net>
Subject: DirectX vs OpenGL
Date: 2000/05/15
Message-ID: <si0i5gdlrj0182@corp.supernews.com>
X-Deja-AN: 623728152
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Mime-version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.api.opengl,3dfx.opengl,microsoft.public.directx
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com