Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"

Article View: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc

Article #27

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc Previous Next

#27

From: Michael Judge
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 06:25

17 lines
1172 bytes

In <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> charles stoyer <cstoyer@interpex.com>
writes: 
>
>BASIC stands for "Beginners All-purpose ? Interpretive Code" 
>and that scares the living hell out of me. I have been a 
>FORTRAN programmer for about 25 years, and have had Visual C++ 
>(with Fortran Power Station) for 2 weeks. C++ is a real 
>language. I would go that route (well, I am going that route). 
>The Wizard does most of the coding for you. Debug tools are 
>great.
>
>Depends on what you want to do: "speed costs, son, how fast do 
>you wanna go?"
>

Also remember, C++ makes good programers great, but makes poor
programmers hell spawn. Don't think object orientation cant be misused.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4e9s5b$lvr@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews

References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: judgemi@ix.netcom.com(Michael Judge )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
Date: 26 Jan 1996 06:25:47 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Message-ID: <4e9s5b$lvr@cloner2.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bos-ma8-24.ix.netcom.com
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Jan 25 10:25:47 PM PST 1996

Reply to Parent Message