Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated
Article #2088Re: Why Use 'Int' Instead of 'Long'? (With today's compilers)
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 22:14
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 22:14
25 lines
1519 bytes
1519 bytes
ok@cs.rmit.edu.au (Richard A. O'Keefe) wrote: >mcv@pi.net (Miguel Carrasquer Vidal) writes: >>What would EOF have to be defined as? >>(-1 might be the glyph ISO+FFFFFFFF CUNEIFORM SYLLABLE ZUT!) >(a) The C standard *nowhere* says that EOF is -1, only that it is negative. I know. I was merely giving -1 as an example of a possible value for EOF. It just happens that, unlike the "ZUT" glyph, -1 as EOF also actually exists "in the real world". >(b) Work is in progress to include cuneiform in Unicode. It's a while since > I read about it, but it was going to fit into the BMP. As an amateur Hittitologist, that's nice to hear. == Miguel Carrasquer Vidal ~ ~ Amsterdam _____________ ~ ~ mcv@pi.net |_____________||| ========================== Ce .sig n'est pas une .cig
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4gtbbm$afu@solutions.solon.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4fjk00$nss@solutions.solon.com> <4fu7tj$9a1@solutions.solon.com> <4g54nt$aih@solutions.solon.com> <4gf916$1dk@solutions.solon.com> <4ggc1d$8a8@solutions.solon.com> <4gkee1$rc1@solutions.solon.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail From: mcv@pi.net (Miguel Carrasquer Vidal) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated Subject: Re: Why Use 'Int' Instead of 'Long'? (With today's compilers) Date: 26 Feb 1996 16:14:14 -0600 Organization: Planet Internet Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com Message-ID: <4gtbbm$afu@solutions.solon.com> References: <4fjk00$nss@solutions.solon.com> <4fu7tj$9a1@solutions.solon.com> <4g54nt$aih@solutions.solon.com> <4gf916$1dk@solutions.solon.com> <4ggc1d$8a8@solutions.solon.com> <4gkee1$rc1@solutions.solon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82