Re: const pointer confusion...

Article View: comp.lang.c.moderated

Article #2401

Back to comp.lang.c.moderated Previous Next

#2401

From: Jerry Coffin
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 00:58

9 lines
847 bytes

In article <4j6354$3ge@solutions.solon.com>, watzka@stat.uni-muenchen.de 
says...

> AFAIK, "const int const *p;" _indeed is_ a syntax error.

That's correct - if the same type qualifier appears more than once in the same 
specifier list or qualifier list, it violates the constraint in $6.5.3.
    Later,
    Jerry.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4ja3r2$p9q@solutions.solon.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail

References: <4j06gm$7oa@solutions.solon.com><4j41hs$nku@solutions.solon.com><4j6354$3ge@solutions.solon.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!solon.com!not-for-mail
From: jcoffin@rmii.com (Jerry Coffin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c.moderated
Subject: Re: const pointer confusion...
Date: 26 Mar 1996 18:58:10 -0600
Organization: TAEUS
Sender: clc@solutions.solon.com
Approved: clc@solutions.solon.com
Message-ID: <4ja3r2$p9q@solutions.solon.com>
References: <4j06gm$7oa@solutions.solon.com><4j41hs$nku@solutions.solon.com><4j6354$3ge@solutions.solon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: solutions.solon.com
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet News32 v1.00 Beta Build 302

Reply to Parent Message