🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4je1pf$g2a@solutions.solon.com>, <aril@cmt.lpr.mail.carel.fi> 
says...
[ my mostly incorrect comment elided ... ] 

> Isn't that what he said?

Yes, it is.  Someday when I learn to read, I might get my posts closer to 
correct...

> FWIW, I've found it intuitive to read the syntax from right 
> to left:
> 
> 	const int *p; = pointer to integer constant
> 	int const *p; = pointer to constant integer (same as above)
> 	int *const p; = constant pointer to integer
> 	const int *const p; = constant pointer to integer constant
> 	int const *const p; = constant pointer to constant integer (same as 
above)

Yup - it's generally expressed as simply the "right to left rule", though in 
many cases it's more the inside to outside rule.  (e.g. in typedef's, you 
generally start around the middle and work your way outward...)
    Later,
    Jerry.