ML variations

Article View: comp.lang.functional

Article #30

Back to comp.lang.functional Previous Next

#30

From: David Martland
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 15:20

14 lines
1027 bytes

I am using Wikstrom's book "Functional Programming Using Standard ML"
in one of the courses I am taking. There seem to be differences
between the book and our compiler, which is PolyML. How up to date is
Wikstrom - have there been major changes to the language since it
was written? Or is it the compiler which is incorrect? We could use
NJ ML, but would that be any better?

It would be useful to have lists of differences between different
versions of ML, and discrepancies with published literature.

If enough people write to me, I will collate a list of differences
and post them to the group.

Martin Watson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bx3HAy.Bx6@brunel.ac.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!brunel!cs91mjw

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!brunel!cs91mjw
From: cs91mjw@brunel.ac.uk.brunel.ac.uk (David Martland)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: ML variations
Message-ID: <Bx3HAy.Bx6@brunel.ac.uk>
Date: 2 Nov 92 15:20:57 GMT
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Lines: 14
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]