🚀 go-pugleaf

My clients must use the Java Plug-In to access the program I'm
writing.  In all actuality, I notice the Java Plug-In is quite faster.
It seems to initialize and run faster..I'm impressed with it.
\/


On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 18:00:40 GMT, sean.mcdermott@usa.net wrote:

>
>
>> > In my latest applet, I've been using the Java plugin and that works quite
>> > well in both browsers...
>> >
>>
>> I already know Swing applets will work if they're signed and we use the Java
>> plug-in. The whole point of my posting was that with the release of Swing,
>> JavaSoft has moved us to a new era. Now you have to SIGN ALL APPLETS TO MATTER
>> WHAT. Remember, before, we only had to sign applets if they attempted to leave
>> the sandbox. That's no longer true! Now, anytime you write an applet, if you
>> use Swing to do the interface, you have to sign it - period.
>
>I've been using Swing 1.0.2 (JFC 1.1?) with IE4 and haven't need to sign
>*anything*.  Everything works perfectly!  You do get a couple of stack traces
>on the Java Console as Swing initializes but these can be ignored.  In fact,
>I'm rather impressed with the speed of Swing once it is loaded.  All I do is
>include the swingall.jar file in the archive part of the applet tag.
>
>I do believe you're last sentance regarding Swing and signing is utter
>nonsense.
>
>
>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp   Create Your Own Free Member Forum