Re: Will Java kill C++?

Article View: comp.lang.java

Article #168

#168

From: Rick DeNatale
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 12:48

27 lines
1586 bytes

In article <316A66FA.4F4B@netalive.com>, "Erik P. DeBenedictis"
<erikd@netalive.com> wrote:

>Andrew Koenig wrote:
>> 
>> In article <4k7akk$nsh@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>
linden@positive.eng.sun.com (Peter van der Linden) writes:
>> 
>> > Andrew Koenig <ark@research.att.com> wrote:
>> > >Of course, the head of Java marketing is expected to say things like this,
>> > >whether or not the facts strictly justify them.
>> 
>> > Well Andrew, one could equally well say that a proponent, supporter,
>> > and author of a book on  C++ would be expected to defend the C++ language
>> > by saying something like this, regardless of whether it is borne out by
>> > the evidence or not  ;-)
>> 
>> Of course.  You should always take people's biases into account
>> when you evaluate what they say.
>
>...yet even a biased person may say things that are worth listening to.

Boy, I sure hope that this thread never degenerates into ad hominem arguments!

-- 
Rick DeNatale
Still looking for a cool signature ;-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <denatale-1004960748380001@grail1506.nando.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!grail1506.nando.net!user

References:

<4k3cdo$np5@taurus.adnc.com> <DpG1s1.GC9@research.att.com> <4k7akk$nsh@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <DpIG6w.LF8@research.att.com> <316A66FA.4F4B@netalive.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!grail1506.nando.net!user
From: denatale@nando.net (Rick DeNatale)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++?
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 07:48:38 -0500
Organization: Nando.net Public Access
Message-ID: <denatale-1004960748380001@grail1506.nando.net>
References: <4k3cdo$np5@taurus.adnc.com> <DpG1s1.GC9@research.att.com> <4k7akk$nsh@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <DpIG6w.LF8@research.att.com> <316A66FA.4F4B@netalive.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: grail1506.nando.net
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.1.5

Reply to Parent Message