Article View: comp.lang.java
Article #107Re: Will Java kill C++?
From: Oliver Plohmann
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 12:27
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 12:27
49 lines
2970 bytes
2970 bytes
Jeff Sutherland wrote: > Systems the size of many large Smalltalk systems have not begun to be built in > Java. The guys at Sun will tell you its not ready for prime time yet. They would > like to deescalate the hype a little bit. Java is just about to take off. Java has climbed quite a bit faster than the Smalltalk baloon in its early days. Backing from industry is much stronger than it earlier (ever?) was for Smalltalk. > Java doesn't even have a modern garbage collector and its performance is > terrible, 10-30 times slower than C. Borland intends to fix this before year's end. I wouldn't call any Smalltalk garbage collector modern. Probably, the most modern one is the one in BETA based on the train algorithm which was implemented by two students in their thesis work. ParcPlace & Co. better had a look at it ... > There is a benchmark in this month's Smalltalk Report showing how a Smalltalk > application can be tuned to run *faster* than C. In Smalltalk all methods are bound dynamically. No way method invocation can ever be faster as function invocation in C with function addresses determined at compile time. With some people you just can't argue that Smalltalk is slow. Java has room for optimization, though. Because there is type information on class level. I think that's how the people from SUN managed to make Self that fast. But I don't know exactly. Hoope this will put pressure on Smalltalk vendors. > I expect that many C++ programmers will begin to use Java as an application language > with C++ seamlessly interfaced as the object-oriented assembler, which is what it was > designed for in the first place. > > The beauty of Java is that it is Smalltalk for C++ programmers. We need it. In my opinion there is much truth in this. Fortunately, Java is file oriented and not image oriented. You can write a small programm and execute it quickly whereas in Smalltalk you have to startup the entire image which takes a lot of time. Java is right in the middle between the two extremes: C++ and Smalltalk. It's the right tool at the right time. Regards, Olli _______________________________________________ Oliver Plohmann +41 41 749 56 52 Software Engineer opl@al.esec.ch Autoline ESEC SA, Cham, Switzerland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3163C031.4FB1@esec.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.eunet.ch!usenetReferences:
<3134D499.653E@ix.netcom.com> <313613B2.136E@ksopk.sprint.com> <4i7qhl$ik6@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> <4iuhi7$fmf@sundog.tiac.net> <4iumap$mn5@hustle.rahul.net> <31582A45.3742@vmark.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.eunet.ch!usenet From: Oliver Plohmann <opl@esec.ch> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: Will Java kill C++? Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 14:27:29 +0200 Organization: ESEC SA Message-ID: <3163C031.4FB1@esec.ch> References: <3134D499.653E@ix.netcom.com> <313613B2.136E@ksopk.sprint.com> <4i7qhl$ik6@cronkite.seas.gwu.edu> <4iuhi7$fmf@sundog.tiac.net> <4iumap$mn5@hustle.rahul.net> <31582A45.3742@vmark.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: everest.esec.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.05 9000/735)