🚀 go-pugleaf

Alex Katz wrote:
> 
> I think any advantages of Java over C++, real or imagined, do not necessarily
> mean that it will begin to displace C++, unless those advantages address
> directly the reasons that C and C++, unlike the vast preponderance of newly
> developed languages, became widely used. And I do not see this thread addressing
> those reasons.
> 
> Alex

In priority order:

1.	Portability.  (Standard language definition.)
2.	Portability.  (Wide availability on all platforms, early.)
3.	Portability.  (Just high level enough that you can write programs that
	               run on different machine architectures without sacrificing
	               performance; as low-level a portable language as possible.)

All other reasons pale by comparison.

For Java, this is still number 1, 2, and 3, but there may be others:

4.	Self-delivering over the web.
5.	Anti-virus security.

Note that for Java, "portability" means something more than it did for C and C++.  
In the context of the web, "portability" means running on any web client, not just 
on any operating system or hardware platform.  C and C++ are no longer portable 
enough, as well as not satisfying (4) and (5).

-- 
David Christie		Netscape Communications Corporation
dc@netscape.com		501 East Middlefield Road
415-937-4407		Mountain View, CA  94043