Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #7113Re: GNU Script isn't fixing something that's broken, so is doomed
From: Kevin K. Lewis
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 1994 21:31
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 1994 21:31
40 lines
3227 bytes
3227 bytes
In article <395rlr$3eh@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU> Tom Christiansen <tchrist@mox.perl.com> writes: [...] If in fact RMS does not want to stop us from writing software that uses other extensions languages *EVEN FOR GNU SOFTWARE*, then fine -- and vice versa. Remember, this isn't just anti-tcl; it's anti anything that doesn't turn into lisp or scheme. If we see edicts mandating rewriting working any software that uses something other than gnuscript, like dejagnu using tcl, mailagent or clip using perl, the new (perl) debugger using tk, or various products that employ ptyhon, then it's not fine at all. It's a useless waste of time driven by political pressure, just as much as demanding that gnuscript be used on gnu software would also be. When all the huffing and puffing is done, only technical and convenience considerations will (or at least, should) prevail. Freedom of choice is something that we MUST NOT SURRENDER. If that's not in danger, but just that RMS has pre-announced a better scripting language (for his version of better, but perhaps not the rest of ours), then fine -- we're happy to have another choice. But it certainly didn't seem that way. [...] No one is forcing you to do anything. Surrender freedom of choice? Only if you let someone else make your decisions for you. Does someone have you in a hammer lock? Use what you like. RMS wants a better scripting language for GNU. And GNU is free. If you don't like his language, you're _free_ to use anything else. If that software doesn't become "official" GNU software, so what? What's to stop you from using it? RMS is proposing a standard. That doesn't mean anyone has to accept it. I still haven't been convinced that anything is broken, and judging from the email responses I've received from individuals flamebashed into avoiding posting, neither have they. Does something have to be broken for people to search for a better way? -- Kevin K. Lewis | My opinions may be unreasonable lewikk@aud.alcatel.com | but such is the voice of inspiration
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<LEWIKK.94Nov1153151@grasshopper.aud.alcatel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!hudson.lm.com!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!bcarh189.bnr.ca!corpgate!news.utdallas.edu!fozzy.aud.alcatel.com!fozzy.aud.alcatel.com!lewikkReferences:
<394kll$kso@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU> <19941101T063951Z.enag@naggum.no> <395rlr$3eh@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,9bda08f2f068881f X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,9bda08f2f068881f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-01 14:21:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!hudson.lm.com!godot.cc.duq.edu!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!nott!bcarh189.bnr.ca!corpgate!news.utdallas.edu!fozzy.aud.alcatel.com!fozzy.aud.alcatel.com!lewikk From: lewikk@grasshopper.aud.alcatel.com (Kevin K. Lewis) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: GNU Script isn't fixing something that's broken, so is doomed Date: 01 Nov 1994 21:31:50 GMT Organization: Alcatel Network Systems Lines: 40 Message-ID: <LEWIKK.94Nov1153151@grasshopper.aud.alcatel.com> References: <394kll$kso@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU> <19941101T063951Z.enag@naggum.no> <395rlr$3eh@csnews.cs.Colorado.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: grasshopper.aud.alcatel.com In-reply-to: Tom Christiansen's message of 1 Nov 1994 16:51:07 GMT