🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited (re Multics)
By: David Collier-Brown on Wed, 20 Dec 1989 23:18

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:29

Need info on PL/1 staff recruiting? Please Santa...!
By: Joseph Jack Spatafora on Sat, 23 Dec 1989 01:02

Re: Thorobred BASIC
By: Scott Amspoker on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 16:47

Thorobred BASIC
By: Roland Dunkerley III on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 09:59

Course in functional programming
By: S.J.Thompson on Fri, 01 Dec 1989 01:00

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 21:54

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Snorri Agnarsson on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 12:59

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Tom Almy on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 17:45

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Saumya K. Debray on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 19:14

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: R. Vuurboom on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 14:50

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Sean Matthews on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 17:29

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Tom Neff on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 22:18

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Steve Wampler on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 19:20

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Johan Vromans on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 23:25

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Eric S. Raymond on Sun, 31 Dec 1989 18:04

The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Bill Smith on Fri, 29 Dec 1989 19:40

Comp.lang.cobol failed
By: Erland Sommarskog on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 19:13

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:07

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:14

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:13

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 21 Dec 1989 18:11

Re: CSP
By: Bob Kitzberger on Thu, 21 Dec 1989 05:25

Re: CCS
By: John Zic on Thu, 21 Dec 1989 07:07

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Wed, 20 Dec 1989 15:30

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: dmr on Wed, 20 Dec 1989 09:42

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Sean Fagan on Wed, 20 Dec 1989 09:46

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Tue, 19 Dec 1989 19:45

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Tue, 19 Dec 1989 19:29

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Tue, 19 Dec 1989 19:04

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Andrew P. Mullhaupt on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 17:34

Re: Inexpensive Simula Compiler
By: G|rel Hedin on Tue, 19 Dec 1989 10:01

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Bjarne Stroustrup on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 15:51

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Dick Dunn on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 19:23

Inexpensive Simula Compiler
By: Glen Ditchfield on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 17:04

Re: Edinburgh ML (summary)
By: Nick Rothwell on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 15:28

Re: CCS
By: Dave Berry on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 13:36

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: dmr on Mon, 18 Dec 1989 06:28

If you're looking for LOTOS (was Re: CSP)
By: Gerald Karam on Sat, 16 Dec 1989 15:24

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Sun, 17 Dec 1989 18:43

Edinburgh ML (summary)
By: a.e.mossberg on Sun, 17 Dec 1989 23:34

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: L.J.Dickey on Sun, 17 Dec 1989 20:15

Re: CSP
By: John Zic on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 23:18

Re: CSP
By: Bill Kinnersley on Sat, 16 Dec 1989 19:25

Wirth and Algol-68 (was Re: Late Bloomers Revisited)
By: John W. Baugh Jr. on Sat, 16 Dec 1989 17:10

Re: CSP
By: Bob Kitzberger on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 07:52

Re: Edinburgh ML
By: Nick Rothwell on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 17:24

Re^2: CSP
By: "Steve" Stevenson on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 19:50

Re: CSP
By: Darren New on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 18:02

Re: Edinburgh ML
By: Kevin S. Van Horn on Fri, 15 Dec 1989 03:03

Re: Edinburgh ML
By: Nick Rothwell on Thu, 14 Dec 1989 12:07

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Paul Campbell on Thu, 14 Dec 1989 05:40

Re: CSP
By: Bill Kinnersley on Thu, 14 Dec 1989 13:36

Cobol
By: Rob Newton on Tue, 06 Jun 1989 12:57

Haskell
By: Jonas Wallgren on Tue, 06 Jun 1989 08:33

Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: John Baugh on Sun, 04 Jun 1989 15:19

Re: Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: William Clinger on Sat, 03 Jun 1989 01:44

Re: Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: William Clinger on Sat, 03 Jun 1989 00:02

Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 02 Jun 1989 20:07

Re: Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 02 Jun 1989 19:34

Re: Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: Paul Schmidt on Thu, 01 Jun 1989 13:08

Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: Chris Prael on Wed, 31 May 1989 18:15

Re: Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: Ken Johnson on Tue, 30 May 1989 16:55

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (garbage col
By: gillies on Mon, 29 May 1989 22:41

Expressive Power - What is it ?
By: Ted Lawson on Sun, 28 May 1989 11:47

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (garbage collection)
By: Mark Weiser on Tue, 30 May 1989 06:58

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (long)
By: Ed Satterthwaite on Sat, 27 May 1989 04:36

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Lee Bentz on Thu, 25 May 1989 16:40

Re: OOP features in Turbo Pascal 5.5
By: Alastair Milne on Fri, 26 May 1989 02:01

Quick Pascal
By: Mark R. Slezak on Fri, 26 May 1989 01:18

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Geoffrey Wyant on Thu, 25 May 1989 21:30

Re: OOP features in Turbo Pascal 5.5
By: Dale Rogerson on Thu, 25 May 1989 18:15

Re: data types for money (was Who uses BASIC these days)
By: s m ryan on Thu, 25 May 1989 00:03

Re: general object oriented reference
By: 3929] on Wed, 24 May 1989 20:08

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Usenet file owner on Wed, 24 May 1989 17:46

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Lee Bentz on Tue, 23 May 1989 16:38

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Lee Bentz on Tue, 23 May 1989 16:30

Re: OOP features in Turbo Pascal 5.5
By: Lee Bentz on Tue, 23 May 1989 16:44

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Alastair Macartney on Tue, 23 May 1989 12:53

Re: general object oriented reference
By: Lee Sailer on Tue, 23 May 1989 16:37

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (garbage col
By: robison on Sun, 21 May 1989 20:53

Re: Who uses BASIC these days
By: Michael Meissner on Mon, 22 May 1989 15:37

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (garbage collection)
By: Bob Sperry on Mon, 22 May 1989 13:16

Re: Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: Chris Dollin on Mon, 22 May 1989 08:30

data types for money (was Who uses BASIC these days)
By: Chris Torek on Mon, 22 May 1989 00:38

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar
By: Michael Rys on Fri, 19 May 1989 17:59

Re: OOP features in Turbo Pascal 5.5
By: Alastair Milne on Sat, 20 May 1989 02:18

general object oriented reference
By: Marc Sarrel on Mon, 22 May 1989 23:26

Floating Point Decimal (was Re: Who uses BASIC these days)
By: Mike Shapiro on Fri, 19 May 1989 21:27

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar (garbage collection)
By: David Chase on Fri, 19 May 1989 18:56

Re: Polymorphism
By: Dave Berry on Thu, 18 May 1989 19:54

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar
By: Jef Poskanzer on Thu, 18 May 1989 22:13

Re: Who uses BASIC these days
By: Rich Strebendt on Thu, 18 May 1989 22:30

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: Tom Almy on Wed, 17 May 1989 14:39

OOP features in Turbo Pascal 5.5
By: Guillermo Ricardo Simari on Wed, 17 May 1989 14:08

Re: Who uses BASIC these days
By: nevin.j.liber on Wed, 17 May 1989 16:36

Re: Linda
By: "Steve" Stevenson on Wed, 17 May 1989 19:39

Re: Xerox PARC's Cedar
By: Steve_Ritacco on Tue, 16 May 1989 22:36

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: The Polar Bear on Mon, 15 May 1989 18:42

Linda
By: Doug Hockin on Tue, 16 May 1989 03:18

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: James Jones on Sun, 14 May 1989 13:58

"Galaxy" language described in May IEEE Software
By: Preston Bannister on Sat, 13 May 1989 02:56

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: Per Bothner on Sat, 13 May 1989 19:47

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: The Polar Bear on Fri, 12 May 1989 18:04

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: Ben Smith on Fri, 12 May 1989 11:34

Re: Floating point equality
By: John Baugh on Wed, 10 May 1989 21:32

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Charles Lindsey on Thu, 11 May 1989 11:36

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: David Gudeman on Thu, 11 May 1989 08:08

Re: Polymorphism
By: David Gudeman on Thu, 11 May 1989 07:58

Re: Polymorphism
By: Alan Lovejoy on Wed, 10 May 1989 18:32

Floating point equality
By: Robert Firth on Wed, 10 May 1989 17:28

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Prescott K. Turner on Wed, 10 May 1989 02:43

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Prescott K. Turner on Wed, 10 May 1989 02:40

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Prescott K. Turner on Wed, 10 May 1989 02:37

Need programming utilities for IBM BASICs....
By: Robert Chao on Tue, 09 May 1989 21:33

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Norman Graham on Tue, 09 May 1989 16:12

Re: Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: John Kallen on Wed, 10 May 1989 02:15

Re: first class functions
By: Jack Campin on Mon, 08 May 1989 12:31

Who uses BASIC these days (for serious application writing)
By: Robert Chao on Tue, 09 May 1989 06:27

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: s m ryan on Mon, 08 May 1989 01:42

Re: Robinson article
By: Jack Campin on Thu, 04 May 1989 13:13

Code for N-lift scheduling problem wanted
By: Juergen Koenemann on Mon, 08 May 1989 14:49

Re: first class functions
By: Stanley Chow on Mon, 08 May 1989 02:44

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: The Cybermat Rider on Sun, 07 May 1989 20:41

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Andrew K. Wright on Sun, 07 May 1989 15:55

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Steve Benz on Sun, 07 May 1989 16:33

Re: first class functions (opps)
By: Prescott K. Turner on Fri, 05 May 1989 16:17

Re: Polymorphism
By: Dave Berry on Fri, 05 May 1989 18:52