🚀 go-pugleaf

Assertions
By: Erland Sommarskog on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 22:27

Use of scope
By: Erland Sommarskog on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 22:26

Re: optimizations
By: Preston Briggs on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 21:42

Re: optimizations, funny results
By: Preston Briggs on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 19:31

Re: optimizations, funny results
By: Doug McDonald on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 16:06

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Kristoffer Eriksson on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 23:56

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: brnstnd on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 04:51

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Kristoffer Eriksson on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 21:26

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: David Chase on Sat, 10 Feb 1990 01:40

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:11

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 19:46

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:43

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:38

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:26

Re: Algol 68.
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 20:19

Optimisation (Re: Common subexpression...)
By: Nick Rothwell on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 16:36

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Michael Meissner on Fri, 09 Feb 1990 17:20

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: brnstnd on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 23:17

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Chris Siebenmann on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:38

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: brnstnd on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 23:28

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Preston Briggs on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 23:24

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 22:57

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Nick Rothwell on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 11:45

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 23:47

Re: Algol 68.
By: James Jones on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 15:53

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Robert Firth on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 13:04

Hope
By: Ken Seefried iii on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 18:37

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Marc Sabatella on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 15:46

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 22:22

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: brnstnd on Thu, 08 Feb 1990 00:06

optimization
By: Preston Briggs on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 18:28

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: R D R on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 17:43

Algol 68.
By: Mike Harrison on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 10:55

Register allocation, etc...
By: Preston Briggs on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 04:50

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Preston Briggs on Wed, 07 Feb 1990 04:27

Re: 'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Marc Sabatella on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 16:12

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 22:20

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 20:59

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: David Chase on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 19:09

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Preston Briggs on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 18:03

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 18:51

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 18:34

'register' variables and other goodies (was Re: Common subexpression optimization)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Feb 1990 01:00

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 16:32

Re: Evaluating Programming Languages
By: Hank Dietz on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 15:25

Re: Evaluating Programming Languages
By: Kers on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 15:17

Re: OCCAM Simulator running under UNIX
By: amos shapira on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 12:53

Re: Evaluating Programming Languages
By: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 on Mon, 05 Feb 1990 02:11

Evaluating Programming Languages
By: Glassy on Sun, 04 Feb 1990 22:36

Re: Goedel & programming languages
By: Pat Chkoreff on Thu, 01 Feb 1990 08:18

Re: NOT Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Sat, 03 Feb 1990 16:59

Re: NOT Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 23:32

Re: Goedel & programming languages
By: Marshall Cline on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 22:30

Re: Goedel & programming languages
By: "Steve" Stevenson on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 21:11

Goedel & programming languages
By: Marc Sabatella on Wed, 31 Jan 1990 15:54

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Preston Briggs on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 03:10

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 02:08

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Preston Briggs on Fri, 02 Feb 1990 01:14

Re: Common subexpression optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 01 Feb 1990 16:48

Semantics (was: NOT Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C)
By: Dave Berry on Thu, 01 Feb 1990 12:34

OCCAM Simulator running under UNIX
By: Dae-Kyun Yoon on Thu, 01 Feb 1990 05:42

Re^2: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Charles Lindsey on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 11:51

Re: NOT Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: John R. Levine on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 23:53

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: R Harrison on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 13:04

Re: Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: Scott Daniels on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 17:25

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Matt Crawford on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 16:09

Quick Basic (Program memory overflow.)
By: Tim McCarthy on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 14:09

Re: Algol 68 info
By: Dale Hagglund on Thu, 11 Jan 1990 06:08

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Barry Margolin on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 05:39

Strong/Weak typing
By: Mark Streich on Thu, 11 Jan 1990 21:26

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Wayne Throop on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 17:15

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Andrew P. Mullhaupt on Thu, 11 Jan 1990 05:50

How to join an ANSI technical committee?
By: Robert Andersson on Thu, 11 Jan 1990 14:17

Re: Algol 68 info
By: Mike Harrison on Thu, 11 Jan 1990 10:41

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Keith Waclena on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 21:21

Fundamental Concepts of Programming languages
By: Stavros Macrakis on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 14:16

Re: Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: Chris Collins on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 14:44

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Markku Sakkinen on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 08:25

Re: Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: Bennett Todd on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 22:24

Re: Algol 68 info
By: Charles Lindsey on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 10:40

Re: Educating FORTRAN programmers to use C
By: Rich Strebendt on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 22:45

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: lawrence.g.mayka on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 16:20

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Nick Rothwell on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 12:42

Recent posts on CL and Scheme
By: John Gateley on Mon, 08 Jan 1990 16:13

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: David Gudeman on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 00:17

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Keith Waclena on Sat, 06 Jan 1990 22:20

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: lawrence.g.mayka on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 23:42

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: lawrence.g.mayka on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 23:25

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: lawrence.g.mayka on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 21:10

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 20:32

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Nick Rothwell on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 11:44

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Reino de Boer on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 08:47

Algol 68 info
By: Tom Markson on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 06:29

Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: David Callahan on Fri, 05 Jan 1990 07:45

Another one (Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language)
By: Nick Rothwell on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 13:16

Re: Edinburgh ML (summary)
By: Aaron Sloman on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 01:15

Occam simulator
By: Dave Eichmann on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 21:42

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: Bob Pendleton on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 18:56

An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing
By: Edward Berard on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 18:16

Typeof operator in C (Re: An Interesting View of "Strong" Vs. "Weak" Typing)
By: Peter da Silva on Fri, 12 Jan 1990 18:58

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Nick Rothwell on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 12:00

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Markku Sakkinen on Wed, 10 Jan 1990 08:33

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Alan Lovejoy on Tue, 09 Jan 1990 03:19

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: L.J.Dickey on Mon, 08 Jan 1990 22:37

occam (was Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X)
By: Roger Shepherd on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 10:06

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: John Schonholtz on Thu, 04 Jan 1990 01:07

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Clay Phipps on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 18:21

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Darren New on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 19:59

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: David Lee Matuszek on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 16:49

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Thomas Beecher on Wed, 03 Jan 1990 03:26

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Johan Vromans on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 20:12

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: R. Vuurboom on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 12:08

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 03:26

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: John R. Levine on Tue, 02 Jan 1990 04:25

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 21:52

Re: The Fundamental Concept of Programming language X
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Mon, 01 Jan 1990 03:53

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: David Phillip Oster on Sun, 31 Dec 1989 08:37

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 28 Dec 1989 21:36

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: George Mitchell on Fri, 29 Dec 1989 18:25

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: Andrew P. Mullhaupt on Thu, 28 Dec 1989 17:43

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: Tom Ohmer on Thu, 28 Dec 1989 19:58

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: D Muxworthy on Thu, 28 Dec 1989 11:53

Re: *66, *68, *77, etc...
By: Robert Fenske Jr on Thu, 28 Dec 1989 14:09

*66, *68, *77, etc...
By: Joseph H Allen on Thu, 21 Dec 1989 02:10

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: David Farber on Wed, 27 Dec 1989 16:22

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Robert Firth on Wed, 27 Dec 1989 15:35

Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
By: Robert Firth on Wed, 27 Dec 1989 15:00

Texts on different paradigms needed
By: Kellom{ki Pertti on Wed, 27 Dec 1989 00:04