Showing up to 128 of
7164 items
(Page 41 of
56)
comp.lang.misc - Article Overview
| Subject | Last Message |
|---|---|
|
Re: Array references cannot be made optimal
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 23:25 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 21:08 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 20:58 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: Array references cannot be made optimal
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 23:05 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Array references cannot be made optimal by an algorithm
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 22:35 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Jim's commitment to misleading the populace
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 20:32 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 20:36 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 20:10 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 20:19 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Steve L Vissage II on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 17:06 |
36 Years ago
By: Steve L Vissage II |
|
Re: Array references cannot be made optimal
By: Mike Bolotski on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 14:19 |
36 Years ago
By: Mike Bolotski |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Mike Bolotski on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 14:29 |
36 Years ago
By: Mike Bolotski |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Peter da Silva on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 16:13 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Errors in postings
By: chased on Tue, 13 Nov 1990 01:41 |
36 Years ago
By: chased |
|
Arrows as pointers (was Re: C's sins of commission)
By: Chris Holt on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 12:55 |
36 Years ago
By: Chris Holt |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: D. C. Sessions on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 21:52 |
36 Years ago
By: D. C. Sessions |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Barry Margolin on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 19:45 |
36 Years ago
By: Barry Margolin |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Dan Bernstein on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 19:08 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Dan Bernstein on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 18:54 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Dan Bernstein on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 18:52 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: ML books and information
By: Nick Rothwell on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 12:46 |
36 Years ago
By: Nick Rothwell |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Hans Mulder on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 13:19 |
36 Years ago
By: Hans Mulder |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 11:54 |
36 Years ago
By: Richard A. O'Keefe |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Richard Harter on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 07:35 |
36 Years ago
By: Richard Harter |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: David Gudeman on Mon, 12 Nov 1990 01:54 |
36 Years ago
By: David Gudeman |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Michael Meissner on Sun, 11 Nov 1990 21:26 |
36 Years ago
By: Michael Meissner |
|
Re: Definition of "Aggressive optimization"
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Sun, 11 Nov 1990 17:58 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Dan Bernstein on Sun, 11 Nov 1990 13:56 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Richard Harter on Sun, 11 Nov 1990 08:33 |
36 Years ago
By: Richard Harter |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 15:53 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 15:29 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 20:55 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: After aliassing -- parallelisation?
By: Dan Bernstein on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 09:14 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Jim's commitment to misleading the populace
By: Dan Bernstein on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 08:51 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 08:37 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
A very brief history of optimal sorting methods
By: Dan Bernstein on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 08:23 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Dan Bernstein on Sat, 10 Nov 1990 08:04 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Marc Sabatella on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 20:16 |
36 Years ago
By: Marc Sabatella |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 04:59 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 04:43 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Peter da Silva on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 13:44 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: After aliassing -- parallelisation?
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 22:18 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 22:07 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Some things that pointer-less languages can't do efficiently
By: Barry Margolin on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 18:30 |
36 Years ago
By: Barry Margolin |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 21:53 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 21:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 21:27 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: After aliassing -- parallelisation?
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 19:38 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization vs HLL's
By: David Chase on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 18:56 |
36 Years ago
By: David Chase |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 16:43 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 16:39 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 16:29 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Some things that pointer-less languages can't do efficiently
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 17:26 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 14:28 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 14:21 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: Some things that pointer-less languages can't do efficiently
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 10:33 |
36 Years ago
By: Richard A. O'Keefe |
|
Re: After aliassing -- parallelisation?
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 06:50 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 06:24 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 06:17 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: ML books and information
By: KINOSHITA Yoshiki on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 04:16 |
36 Years ago
By: KINOSHITA Yoshiki |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 06:00 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 05:50 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 05:42 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Array references cannot be made optimal may an algorithm
By: Dan Bernstein on Fri, 09 Nov 1990 05:22 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
After aliassing -- parallelisation?
By: Dr A. N. Walker on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 18:30 |
36 Years ago
By: Dr A. N. Walker |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Dr A. N. Walker on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 17:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Dr A. N. Walker |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 19:59 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 19:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 19:18 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 22:02 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 21:56 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 21:38 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Mike Bolotski on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:17 |
36 Years ago
By: Mike Bolotski |
|
Re: Re^4: Some things that pointer-less languages can't do efficiently
By: Jeff Dalton on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 21:25 |
36 Years ago
By: Jeff Dalton |
|
Re: Some things that pointer-less languages can't do efficiently
By: Jeff Dalton on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:45 |
36 Years ago
By: Jeff Dalton |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 16:14 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Greg Lindahl on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 03:34 |
36 Years ago
By: Greg Lindahl |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Greg Lindahl on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 03:13 |
36 Years ago
By: Greg Lindahl |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Greg Lindahl on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 02:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Greg Lindahl |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 01:02 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:47 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:24 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 08 Nov 1990 00:18 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 23:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 23:28 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 22:20 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:38 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:35 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:28 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:32 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:29 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Dan Bernstein on Wed, 07 Nov 1990 20:22 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 18:17 |
36 Years ago
By: Piercarlo Grandi |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Steven Ryan on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:12 |
36 Years ago
By: Steven Ryan |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Greg Lindahl on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 22:44 |
36 Years ago
By: Greg Lindahl |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 22:09 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 22:00 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 21:56 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 21:51 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 21:43 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: David Gudeman on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 21:28 |
36 Years ago
By: David Gudeman |
|
Re: Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 21:02 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:58 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:54 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:48 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:50 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:42 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:39 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Definition of "Aggressive optimization"
By: Rick Gorton on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 18:39 |
36 Years ago
By: Rick Gorton |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:13 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 20:03 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 19:49 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 19:40 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 19:32 |
36 Years ago
By: Jim Giles |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 14:09 |
36 Years ago
By: Peter da Silva |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: David Chase on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 18:28 |
36 Years ago
By: David Chase |
|
Whether cc after f2c can optimize arrays as well as f77 can
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 08:20 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:37 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:32 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: C's sins of commission
By: Herman Rubin on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 13:28 |
36 Years ago
By: Herman Rubin |
|
Languages for machine-dependent hacks
By: Herman Rubin on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 10:17 |
36 Years ago
By: Herman Rubin |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:26 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:20 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:10 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:02 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Aggressive optimization
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 07:16 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 1: TeX (was C's sins... and others)
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 06:59 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
|
Re: Answers, Chapter 2: to point or not to point
By: Dan Bernstein on Tue, 06 Nov 1990 06:57 |
36 Years ago
By: Dan Bernstein |
Showing up to 128 of
7164 items
(Page 41 of
56)