🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Nick Rothwell on Fri, 08 Jun 1990 09:12

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Michael Flower on Thu, 07 Jun 1990 21:37

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Vinod Grover on Thu, 07 Jun 1990 17:45

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Flint Pellett on Thu, 07 Jun 1990 15:40

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Bruce A. Martin on Thu, 07 Jun 1990 15:22

Re: C vs. FORTRAN (was C official DOD langauge?)
By: Richard A. O'Keefe on Thu, 07 Jun 1990 00:03

Re: A different view of the goto controversy
By: Dave Jones on Fri, 01 Jun 1990 20:40

Fortran 77 to C conversion tool available??????
By: Burch Seymour on Mon, 04 Jun 1990 20:55

Oberon
By: Dan Allen on Fri, 01 Jun 1990 10:18

Re: Sick idea, figuring byte order in Fortran
By: Clay Phipps on Thu, 31 May 1990 17:35

Re: Is there a discussion on MATHEMATICA ?
By: Raja Sooriamurthi on Wed, 30 May 1990 18:26

Is there a discussion on MATHEMATICA ?
By: Markus Lautenbacher on Wed, 30 May 1990 16:22

Re: What's left of Euclid ?????
By: Kolkka Markku Olavi on Tue, 29 May 1990 12:41

Re: What's left of Euclid ?????
By: EAF on Fri, 25 May 1990 08:52

Parallel FORTRAN bite
By: David Keppel on Thu, 31 May 1990 16:10

IEEE Floating point Standard
By: Homayoon Akhiani on Thu, 10 May 1990 00:20

language skills and programming (Re: Intro to CS ...)
By: Dave Jones on Mon, 07 May 1990 22:25

Re: introductory language
By: Dave Jones on Fri, 04 May 1990 00:18

Re: FORTRAN I/O (Was: Lessons from Algol)
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 04 May 1990 22:44

Re: Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Tony Warnock on Fri, 04 May 1990 19:13

FORTRAN I/O (Was: Lessons from Algol)
By: Richard Conto on Fri, 04 May 1990 17:07

Re: Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Peter da Silva on Fri, 04 May 1990 12:36

Re: CLU implementations
By: Matti Jokinen on Thu, 03 May 1990 21:54

Re: Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Tony Warnock on Thu, 03 May 1990 19:59

Re: Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 03 May 1990 13:20

Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Markku Sakkinen on Wed, 02 May 1990 10:57

Re: Lessons from Algol (Was: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Alex Martelli on Tue, 08 May 1990 18:22

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 23:09

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Sun, 15 Apr 1990 00:01

Re: what is c++, c, ansi c etc...
By: Paul Frederick Snively on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 16:32

Re: introductory language
By: Dave Jones on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 01:55

Re: Intermediate Code
By: Dave Jones on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 01:14

Re: introductory language
By: Lars Thomas Hansen on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 04:13

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 20:08

Unions improve aliasing analysis; EQUIVALENCEs hurt it
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 19:39

Re: what is c++, c, ansi c etc...
By: Dave Jones on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 01:12

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Barry Margolin on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 05:28

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: David Gudeman on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 03:48

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: David Gudeman on Sat, 14 Apr 1990 03:21

Re: introductory language
By: Dave Jones on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 01:59

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Tim Budd on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 21:08

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Piercarlo Grandi on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 15:41

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Darren New on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 14:43

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Sean Fagan on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 06:25

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses)
By: Kristoffer Eriksson on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 02:04

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Scott MacHaffie on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 01:06

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 13 Apr 1990 01:23

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: lawrence.g.mayka on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 14:43

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 15:48

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Mike Bolotski on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 17:57

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Andy Novobilski on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 15:33

Re: The Turing Programming Language
By: Tom Neff on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 03:46

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Mike Harrison on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 11:36

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Ozan Yigit on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 21:50

Re: JLG's optimized out. /dev/null wins.
By: Ozan Yigit on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 21:38

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Darren New on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 12:38

Re: interprocedural analysis
By: Preston Briggs on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 06:04

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 03:24

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 03:17

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 03:06

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 02:49

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 02:26

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 02:21

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Duke Briscoe on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 02:40

Re: interprocedural analysis
By: Jim Giles on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 01:49

To Compile Is To Plunder ? (Re: Word Origins)
By: Clay Phipps on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 22:54

Re: Word Origins
By: Clay Phipps on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 22:40

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Mike Bolotski on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 01:09

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Marc Sabatella on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 15:48

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 22:53

Re: Languages that allow extensions to classes
By: Preston Briggs on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 22:43

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 22:29

The number of aliasing patterns for N arrays
By: brnstnd on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 21:38

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Thu, 12 Apr 1990 21:07

interprocedural analysis
By: Preston Briggs on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 19:47

The Turing Programming Language
By: Stephen Perelgut on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 19:49

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Peter da Silva on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 14:27

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Peter da Silva on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 14:10

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Peter da Silva on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 13:58

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Peter da Silva on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 13:52

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Sean Fagan on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 11:58

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Michael Meissner on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 15:29

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Michael Meissner on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 15:25

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Sean Fagan on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 08:20

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Mike Harrison on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 10:20

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 01:07

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 06:02

Re: JLG's flogging of horses
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 05:33

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 06:34

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 05:43

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 05:29

Re: introductory language
By: diamond on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 04:05

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 05:06

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 02:47

Re: JLG's flogging of horses
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 02:35

Re: JLG's flogging of horses
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 02:11

Re: Error returns
By: brnstnd on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 02:06

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Marc Sabatella on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 15:00

Re: Turing
By: Peter Lim on Mon, 09 Apr 1990 22:20

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 21:14

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:47

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:32

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: David Gudeman on Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:24

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 23:44

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 23:14

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Niels J|rgen Kruse on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 21:52

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 22:00

Re: interprocedural alias analyis and pointers
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 21:13

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 19:27

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 21:02

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 20:38

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 20:20

Re: Structured Pgmming With GoTos (Re: do...while vs. repeat...until)
By: Richard Conto on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 19:55

ML course advertisement
By: Dave Berry on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 17:12

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Preston Briggs on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 18:26

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 08:38

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples
By: Felix Lee on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 17:31

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Preston Briggs on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 17:14

interprocedural alias analyis and pointers
By: Preston Briggs on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 16:25

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 12:40

Re: Pointers as 3-tuples (Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++))
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 12:25

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Doug McDonald on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 15:10

Re: introductory language
By: John F Nixon on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 14:40

Re: Cheap implementations of languages (Re: Pointers and poor implementations (was: Re: JLG's flogging ...))
By: Mike Harrison on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 12:53

Re: introductory language
By: John F Nixon on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 11:55

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 08:25

Re: introductory language (meaningfull?)
By: David Collier-Brown on Mon, 09 Apr 1990 12:36

Re: JLG's flogging of horses (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 10 Apr 1990 07:40