Article View: comp.lang.oberon
Article #1202Re: Oakwood & In Module
From: Mike Griebling
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 15:58
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 15:58
22 lines
1203 bytes
1203 bytes
> Hello, > > i realized that the Oakwood definition for the In module assumes > that all Numbers are unsigned. Is this usefull? What were the reasons > for this? Can is savely ignore the report? The o2c In module conforms > to the guidelines, this makes porting Stuff like XYplane, well, difficult. Don't you mean only signed numbers are supported? What does XYplane require? I didn't think the Oberon-2 language supported unsigned numbers? > Any hints? Not yet -- but I'm hoping you'll give us more information. :-) > Dirk Regards, Michael -------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Griebling, P. Eng. mgriebling@bix.com Computer Inspirations grieblm@trt.allied.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9603261531.AA02326@trt.allied.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!inf.ethz.ch!oberon-news@inf.ethz.chShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!inf.ethz.ch!oberon-news@inf.ethz.ch From: grieblm@trt.allied.com (Mike Griebling) Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon Subject: Re: Oakwood & In Module Date: 26 Mar 1996 16:58:56 +0100 Organization: Dept. Informatik, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Sender: server@inf.ethz.ch Distribution: world Message-ID: <9603261531.AA02326@trt.allied.com> Reply-To: oberon-news@inf.ethz.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: neptune.inf.ethz.ch Originator: oberon-news@inf.ethz.ch