Oakwood & In Module

Article View: comp.lang.oberon

Article #1203

#1203

From: Dirk Vleugels
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 17:16

17 lines
937 bytes

Hello,

i realized that the Oakwood definition for the In module assumes
that all Numbers are unsigned. Is this usefull? What were the reasons
for this? Can is savely ignore the report? The o2c In module conforms
to the guidelines, this makes porting Stuff like XYplane, well, difficult.

Any hints?

Dirk

-- 
Dirk Vleugels 	                http://www.do.isst.fhg.de/~vleugels

"It's 206 ms to Chicago, we've got a full disk of GIFs, half a meg of 
 hypertext, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses."
                             "Click it." -- <bluesbros@bluesbros.com>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4j6kd0$hdd@hal.do.isst.fhg.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hal.do.isst.fhg.de!usenet

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!hal.do.isst.fhg.de!usenet
From: vleugels@do.isst.fhg.de (Dirk Vleugels)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.oberon
Subject: Oakwood & In Module
Date: 25 Mar 1996 17:16:16 GMT
Organization: FhG ISST Dortmund, Germany
Message-ID: <4j6kd0$hdd@hal.do.isst.fhg.de>
Reply-To: vleugels@do.isst.fhg.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: po
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.5