Re: Straining PostScript or just stupid?

Article View: comp.lang.postscript

Article #284

Back to comp.lang.postscript Previous Next

#284

From: Mike Fischbein
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1992 12:44

10 lines
871 bytes

Just as a data point, it took 2.6 seconds on my SPARCStation 2.

	mike

--
Michael Fischbein,  Technical Consultant, Sun Professional Services
Sun Albany, NY  518-783-9613         michael.fischbein@east.sun.com
These are my opinions and not necessarily those of any other person
or organization.                                    Save the skeet!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14h0s5INNoda@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!seven-up.East.Sun.COM!rotary.Central.Sun.COM!msf

References: <1992Jul20.175703.9855@raven.alaska.edu> <1992Jul21.020653.22903@news.eng.convex.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!seven-up.East.Sun.COM!rotary.Central.Sun.COM!msf
From: msf@rotary.Central.Sun.COM (Mike Fischbein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Straining PostScript or just stupid?
Date: 21 Jul 1992 12:44:53 GMT
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Albany, NY
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <14h0s5INNoda@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>
References: <1992Jul20.175703.9855@raven.alaska.edu> <1992Jul21.020653.22903@news.eng.convex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rotary.east.sun.com

Reply to Parent Message