🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Nov10.231730.8716@cs.brown.edu>
	jgm@cs.brown.edu (Jonathan Monsarrat) writes:
>Yes, it would be nice to have a new newsgroup, which would include
>source postings.

Yes that would be nice.  A moderated posting of PS source would
prevent it from becoming yet another binaries/pictures group.

>Could this new newsgroup also be for more general discussion
>of programming PostScript? Our beloved comp.lang.postscript seems
>to be more than half devoted to asking and answering questions about
>using PostScript. I think that this is a fine, fine service that 
>PostScript-ers provide to each other and to newcomers.

If you want to talk about PS programming, just use
comp.lang.postscript -- nobody is stopping you!!  The fact that people
are often asking questions about how to use PS shouldn't prevent you
from posting programming questions here.

>Still, it would be nice to concentrate directly on programming aspects.

The group is what you make of it.  If you start posting more
programming aspects here, then they will be discussed here.  No need
to create yet another group, when the existing group is just fine.

>comp.graphics.postscript

Again, there is no need to create another group when
comp.lang.postscript serves the purpose just fine.

						-- Rich
-- 
		      Don't blame me; I voted Libertarian
Disclaimer: I speak for myself, except as noted; Copyright 1992 Rich Thomson
UUCP: ...!uunet!dsd.es.com!rthomson			Rich Thomson
Internet: rthomson@dsd.es.com	IRC: _Rich_		PEXt Programmer