Article View: comp.lang.postscript
Article #4082Re: Is there interest in comp.sources.postscript?
From: Rich Thomson
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 07:49
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 07:49
30 lines
1628 bytes
1628 bytes
In article <4424@vidiot.UUCP>
brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes:
>For starters, I'd stick with the following groups:
>
> comp.sources.postscript
This sounds fine.
> comp.sources.postscript.d
I'm really confused why this group is needed. Why can't the
discussion take place in this newsgroup? Whenever talking about
proposing groups on usenet, always ask youself this question:
Will an existing group serve the need?
For me, the need for a place to discuss postscript programming and
postscript programming techniques is served by comp.lang.postscript.
The need for a group explicitly for posting postscript source isn't
directly served by c.l.p it seems. This is even more the case when
you consider the fact that you probably would like to have the sources
group moderated.
-- Rich
--
Don't blame me; I voted Libertarian
Disclaimer: I speak for myself, except as noted; Copyright 1992 Rich Thomson
UUCP: ...!uunet!dsd.es.com!rthomson Rich Thomson
Internet: rthomson@dsd.es.com IRC: _Rich_ PEXt Programmer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov13.074923.8783@dsd.es.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!orca!mesa!rthomsonReferences:
<1992Nov7.141220.4309@kosman.uucp> <1992Nov10.231730.8716@cs.brown.edu> <4424@vidiot.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!orca!mesa!rthomson From: rthomson@mesa.dsd.es.com (Rich Thomson) Subject: Re: Is there interest in comp.sources.postscript? Message-ID: <1992Nov13.074923.8783@dsd.es.com> Sender: usenet@dsd.es.com Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.85.21 Reply-To: rthomson@dsd.es.com (Rich Thomson) Organization: Design Systems Division, Evans & Sutherland, SLC, UT References: <1992Nov7.141220.4309@kosman.uucp> <1992Nov10.231730.8716@cs.brown.edu> <4424@vidiot.UUCP> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 07:49:23 GMT Lines: 30