🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <637@cresswell.quintus.UUCP> ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
|   blah blah blah
|
|Let me quote Henry Spencer:
|
|   meta-blah blah blah
|
|>								  Inspite
|Should this be "In spite"?  There is no word "inspite".          ^^^^^^^
|
|   blah blah blah
|
|Let me offer an example of "creativity".
|    In my MSc work...
|
|   blah blah blah
|
|            Laws and patterns *enable* the Great Dance, they are a
|trellis for the vine of life, a skeleton for the playing otter.
|
|   blah blah blah
|
|                                          (If you think you know who
|I have in mind, you're *wrong*.  Yes you are.)
|
|   blah blah blah

     Personally, my theory is that O'Keefe *is* Henry Spencer.
Their styles are amazingly similar.  They even both quote from
themselves.  Has anyone ever seen them together?

     On the other hand, O'Keefe, on odd, random occasions,
seems to actually know what he's talking about, so that theory
doesn't quite hold.  Perhaps Spencer/O'Keefe has a split
personality?

>Summary:
>
>   blah blah blah
>
>	Who would you rather buy a program from?

     Will some given answer cause him to stick to posting
sensible articles?  If so, that's my vote.