Re: tools & modules in Quintus-Prolog

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #2992

#2992

From: Richard A. O'Keefe
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1988 07:15

17 lines
1356 bytes

In article <497@ecrcvax.UUCP>, bruno@ecrcvax.UUCP (Bruno Poterie) writes:
> Hello,
> did some of you used the Quintus meta_predicate mechanism to write tools?
> i mean, such as your own version of setof/bagof, or a customised top-level,...
> i would like to hear about such experiences, if it was easy or not, if there
> were some problems or not, etc... and especially if it was combined with the
> explicit ':' module specification or absolutely transparent.
> Please mail me, and i will sumarise and post to the net.

Would anyone who intends to reply to that message
		***PLEASE***
send a copy to us at Quintus as well?

Anyone who has done this *should* have found it easy:  the library contains
lots of examples, such as library(setof), library(call), library(foreach),
library(maplist), library(retract).  It is probably easier to build on
these (particularly library(call)) than to start from scratch.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <655@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!quintus!ok

References: <497@ecrcvax.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!quintus!ok
From: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: tools & modules in Quintus-Prolog
Summary: us too!
Keywords: tool module meta-predicate quintus
Message-ID: <655@cresswell.quintus.UUCP>
Date: 17 Feb 88 07:15:55 GMT
References: <497@ecrcvax.UUCP>
Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Mountain View, CA
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message