GNU or Unipress EMACS best w/Quintus Prolog?

Article View: comp.lang.prolog

Article #3391

#3391

From: Walter Maner
Date: Fri, 20 May 1988 16:24

11 lines
1006 bytes

We have the happy dilemma of deciding whether to use the excellent Unipress
EMACS which come bundled with Quintus Prolog or integrating the GNU EMACS,
already installed, with Quintus Prolog.  Any observations of experiences
would be welcome.  I suppose our preference is to interface with GNU if that
is easily accomplished without loss of functionality.
 
-- 
CSNet   : maner@research1.bgsu.edu               | CS Dept    419/372-2337
UUCP    : {cbatt,cbosgd}!osu-cis!bgsuvax!maner   | BGSU
Generic : maner%research1.bgsu.edu@relay.cs.net  | Bowling Green, OH 43403
Opinion : If you are married, you deserve a MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER weekend!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2276@bgsuvax.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!maner

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!maner
From: maner@bgsuvax.UUCP (Walter Maner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog,gnu.emacs
Subject: GNU or Unipress EMACS best w/Quintus Prolog?
Message-ID: <2276@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 20 May 88 16:24:53 GMT
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 11