Article View: comp.lang.prolog
Article #3392Re: GNU or Unipress EMACS best w/Quintus Prolog?
From: Martin Carroll
Date: Fri, 20 May 1988 19:31
Date: Fri, 20 May 1988 19:31
8 lines
670 bytes
670 bytes
>We have the happy dilemma of deciding whether to use the excellent Unipress >EMACS which come bundled with Quintus Prolog or integrating the GNU EMACS... GNU GNU GNU GNU GNU GNU GNU I hate unipress. martin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<May.20.15.31.03.1988.6969@cars.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!gatech!rutgers!paul.rutgers.edu!cars.rutgers.edu!carrollReferences:
<2276@bgsuvax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!uunet!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!gatech!rutgers!paul.rutgers.edu!cars.rutgers.edu!carroll From: carroll@cars.rutgers.edu (Martin Carroll) Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog,gnu.emacs Subject: Re: GNU or Unipress EMACS best w/Quintus Prolog? Message-ID: <May.20.15.31.03.1988.6969@cars.rutgers.edu> Date: 20 May 88 19:31:05 GMT References: <2276@bgsuvax.UUCP> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 8