🚀 go-pugleaf

killoran@ll.mit.edu (Mike Killoran) writes:
>   ...
>	Thanks for the patches to allow for the dynamic allocation of parallel
>transistors.  Is this any better than changing MAX_PARALLEL however? (besides,
>obviously, storage space)  After changing MAX_PARALLEL the complaint about
>too many parallel transistors went away... and the other message (internal
>error: no events but npending set) showed up.  Will your patch fix this problem?
>	Mike Killoran
>	killoran@ll.mit.edu

Mike,
I wish I could tell you that it would, but since I have not seen the       
problem (and actually have been out of VLSI circles for a couple years) I  
can't say that it will.  However, if you did not patch the header file     
that Christos mentioned (net.h) you could certainly be getting all sorts   
of problems.  The index into the array is defined as char.  If the offset  
has the 7th bit as one, it is treated as a NEGATIVE offset.  This will     
screw you to no end.  It is imperative that you make it an unsigned short  
or something like that.

mark


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Linderman            |         Cornell University
linder@ee.cornell.edu     | Department of Electrical Engineering
----------------------------------------------------------------------