🚀 go-pugleaf

  orpheus@reed.edu (P. Hawthorne) writes:
: I feel that there ought to be a graph theoretic newsgroup, if only for
: the insights that such a multidisciplinary newsgroup could offer.

  jon@alpha.ee.ufl.edu (Jon Mellott) writes:
: The traffic on this newsgroup does not warrant the creation of a spin-off 
: newsgroup. I don't recall ever seeing any discussion of graph theory in 
: this newsgroup (I could be wrong) so I don't see that there is a need. 

  I posted to this newsgroup because I have read much about aspects of
graph theory that are relevant to lsi. It was for similar reasons that I
posted to comp.parallel, comp.object, comp.compilers, and sundry others,
although I have seen explicit mention of graphs on those other groups.

  While graph theory may not be an active enough topic on this newsgroup to
warrant a separate group, graph issues are raised on many other newsgroups
regularly. I have gotten about thirty responses so far today, from people
from very diverse groups. All have been in favor, with the exception of
yours and a fellow from sci.math who had very similar reasons.

  I suggest a graph theory group not to fragment comp.lsi, but to unify
fairly significant elements of many other newsgroups.

  Theus (orpheus@reed.edu)